Literature DB >> 19132410

Incorporating diffuse photosynthetically active radiation in a single-leaf model of canopy photosynthesis for a 56-year-old Douglas-fir forest.

Tiebo Cai1, Andrew Black, Rachhpal S Jassal, Kai Morgenstern, Zoran Nesic.   

Abstract

A simple top-down model of canopy photosynthesis (P) was developed and tested in this study. The model (referred to as the Q(e)-MM model) is P = alphaQ (e) P (max)/(alphaQ ( e ) + P (max)), alpha and P (max) are quantum-use efficiency and potential P, respectively. Q (e) is given by Q (d) (0) + kQ (b) (0), where Q (d) (0) and Q (b) (0) are the diffuse and direct photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) incident on the canopy, respectively. Q (e) can be considered to be the effective incident PAR contributing to P and k is a measure of the contribution of Q (b) (0) to Q (e). When k = 1, the Q(e)-MM model becomes the regular Michaelis-Menten type model of P (referred to as the MM model). A major objective of this study was to determine how well the Q(e)-MM model could estimate P of a 56-year-old coastal Douglas-fir stand. To this end, we parameterized the Q(e)-MM model using five and half years of eddy-covariance measurements of CO(2) flux above the Douglas-fir stand. The Q(e)-MM model, with the incorporation of a function of air temperature, accounted for 74% of the variance in over 34,000 half-hourly P measurements. P estimated using the Q(e)-MM model had no systematic errors with respect to Q (d) (0). Although the Q(e)-MM model has only one more parameter than the MM model, it accounted for 30% more variance in P than the latter when total incident PAR exceeded 900 micromol m(-2) s(-1). On average, k was found to be 0.22. We show that this small value of k reflects the significant effect of the scattering of the solar beam and the fraction of light-limited sunlit leaves. We also show that the success of the Q(e)-MM model was due to the fact that a large fraction of the sunlit leaves were light-limited as a result of their orientation to the solar beam.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19132410     DOI: 10.1007/s00484-008-0196-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biometeorol        ISSN: 0020-7128            Impact factor:   3.787


  5 in total

1.  Response of a deciduous forest to the Mount Pinatubo eruption: enhanced photosynthesis.

Authors:  Lianhong Gu; Dennis D Baldocchi; Steve C Wofsy; J William Munger; Joseph J Michalsky; Shawn P Urbanski; Thomas A Boden
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Instantaneous canopy photosynthesis: analytical expressions for sun and shade leaves based on exponential light decay down the canopy and an acclimated non-rectangular hyperbola for leaf photosynthesis.

Authors:  J H M Thornley
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  A new paradigm in leaf-level photosynthesis: direct and diffuse lights are not equal.

Authors:  Craig R Brodersen; Thomas C Vogelmann; William E Williams; Holly L Gorton
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 7.228

4.  On the direct effect of clouds and atmospheric particles on the productivity and structure of vegetation.

Authors:  Michael L Roderick; Graham D Farquhar; Sandra L Berry; Ian R Noble
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Low stomatal and internal conductance to CO2 versus Rubisco deactivation as determinants of the photosynthetic decline of ageing evergreen leaves.

Authors:  G J Ethier; N J Livingston; D L Harrison; T A Black; J A Moran
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.228

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.