Literature DB >> 19131913

The development of the Glamorgan paediatric pressure ulcer risk assessment scale.

J Willock1, M M Baharestani, D Anthony.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a predictive pressure ulcer risk assessment scale based on patient data.
METHOD: Detailed questionnaires, based on a review of the paediatric and adult literature and discussion with paediatric nurses with expertise in this area, were used to obtain data on patient characteristics from 265 inpatients in a children's hospital and 54 children with pressure ulcers and 17 children without pressure ulcers from 11 hospitals. These data were then combined to compare the characteristics of children with and without pressure ulcers (using the chi-square test).
RESULTS: The Glamorgan paediatric pressure ulcer risk assessment scale was developed, based on the significance values identified by the statistical analysis. Variables that were significantly (p<0.01) associated with pressure ulceration included: difficult to position, anaemia, equipment pressing or rubbing against skin, reduced mobility for age, prolonged surgery and persistent pyrexia. The sensitivity, specificity and predictive validity of the Glamorgan scale was found to be greater than those for the Braden Q scale, which is widely used to assess pressure ulcer risk in children in the US.
CONCLUSION: Using patient data from children and young people in the development of risk assessment tools for this age group may be preferable to modifying existing adult tools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19131913     DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2009.18.1.32135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wound Care        ISSN: 0969-0700            Impact factor:   2.072


  7 in total

1.  Pressure ulcers' incidence, preventive measures, and risk factors in neonatal intensive care and intermediate care units.

Authors:  Pablo García-Molina; Evelin Balaguer-López; Francisco Pedro García-Fernández; María de Los Ángeles Ferrera-Fernández; José María Blasco; José Verdú
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Do pressure ulcer risk assessment scales improve clinical practice?

Authors:  Jan Kottner; Katrin Balzer
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2010-07-23

Review 3.  Reviewing the Evidence Base for the Children and Young People Safety Thermometer (CYPST): A Mixed Studies Review.

Authors:  Lydia Aston; Caron Eyre; Michelle McLoughlin; Rachel Shaw
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2016-01-11

Review 4.  Instruments for the care of pressure injury in pediatrics and hebiatrics: an integrative review of the literature.

Authors:  Mayara Kelly Moura Ferreira; Sabrina de Souza Gurgel; Francisca Elisângela Teixeira Lima; Maria Vera Lúcia Moreira Leitão Cardoso; Viviane Martins da Silva
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2018-08-09

Review 5.  Predictive accuracy of the Braden Q Scale in risk assessment for paediatric pressure ulcer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yaoji Liao; Guozhen Gao; Lulu Mo
Journal:  Int J Nurs Sci       Date:  2018-10-10

6.  Cultural adaptation of the Glamorgan Scale to Brazilian Portuguese: Pressure Injury in Pediatrics.

Authors:  Marcelli Cristine Vocci; Cassiana Mendes Bertoncello Fontes; Luciana Patricia Fernandes Abbade
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2021-04-09

7.  Predictive risk scales for development of pressure ulcers in pediatric patients admitted to general ward and intensive care unit.

Authors:  Wen-Jun Luo; Xue-Zhen Zhou; Jia-Ying Lei; Ying Xu; Rui-Hua Huang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 1.337

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.