Literature DB >> 19131678

The change in the diffusion of water in normal and degenerative lumbar intervertebral discs following joint mobilization compared to prone lying.

Paul F Beattie1, Jonathan W Donley, Cathy F Arnot, Ronald Miller.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective, repeated measures obtained under treatment and control conditions.
OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to provide preliminary evidence regarding the immediate change in the diffusion of water in the nuclear region of normal and degenerative lumbar intervertebral discs (IVDs) following a single session of lumbar joint mobilization, and to compare these findings to the immediate change in the diffusion of water following a 10-minute session of prone lying.
BACKGROUND: There is conflicting evidence regarding the effectiveness and efficacy of lumbar joint mobilization. Increased knowledge of the physiologic effects of lumbar joint mobilization can lead to refinement of its clinical application. METHODS AND MEASURES: A total of 24 people (15 males and 9 females), ranging in age from 22 to 58 years, participated in this study. All subjects had a history of activity-limiting low back pain. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images (DW-MRIs) were obtained immediately before and after a 10-minute session of lumbar joint mobilization. At least 1 month later, a second session was performed in which DW-MRIs were obtained immediately before and after a 10-minute session of prone lying.
RESULTS: Following lumbar joint mobilization, a significant increase (P = .002) in the mean values for diffusion of water was observed within degenerative IVDs at L5-S1 (22.2% increase; effect size, 0.97). Degenerative IVDs at L1-2 to L4-5 and normal IVDs at L1-2 to L5-S1 did not demonstrate a change in diffusion following joint mobilization. Prone lying was not associated with a change in diffusion for normal or degenerative IVDs.
CONCLUSIONS: The stimulus provided by lumbar joint mobilization may influence the diffusion of water in degenerative IVDs at L5-S1; however, these are preliminary findings and the relationship of these findings to pain and function needs further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19131678     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Biochemical magnetic resonance imaging of intervertebral discs and facet joints].

Authors:  D Stelzeneder; S Trattnig
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Diffusion-weighted imaging in musculoskeletal radiology-clinical applications and future directions.

Authors:  Nicholas Bhojwani; Peter Szpakowski; Sasan Partovi; Martin H Maurer; Ulrich Grosse; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk; Lisa Zipp-Partovi; Nathan Fergus; Christos Kosmas; Konstantin Nikolaou; Mark R Robbin
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-10

Review 3.  Intervertebral disc degeneration and regeneration: a motion segment perspective.

Authors:  B Ashinsky; H E Smith; R L Mauck; S E Gullbrand
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.942

4.  Short-term increase in discs' apparent diffusion is associated with pain and mobility improvements after spinal mobilization for low back pain.

Authors:  Paul Thiry; François Reumont; Jean-Michel Brismée; Frédéric Dierick
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Long-term running in middle-aged men and intervertebral disc health, a cross-sectional pilot study.

Authors:  Ulrike H Mitchell; Jennifer A Bowden; Robert E Larson; Daniel L Belavy; Patrick J Owen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.