BACKGROUND: Despite the benefits of live donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) over deceased donor kidney transplantation, patients hesitate to pursue this option. METHODS: A total of 324 transplant-eligible haemodialysis patients attending 14 dialysis facilities in Maryland, Northern Virginia and Southern Pennsylvania were asked about their stages of readiness to pursue LDKT, attitudes towards LKDT and demographics. Logistic regressions were used to test the effect of patients' attitudes and demographics on their stages of readiness to pursue LDKT. RESULTS: Fewer than half of the patients who had heard about LDKT were considering this option. Among patients considering LDKT, 26% had not talked to their loved ones about LDKT and 54% had not asked anyone for a kidney. Concerns about the surgical procedure for the donor were associated with a lower likelihood of considering LDKT (adjusted OR = 0.38; CI 0.18-0.79), talking about LDKT (adjusted OR = 0.38; CI 0.18-0.78) and asking for a kidney (adjusted OR = 0.14; CI 0.06-0.36). Being satisfied with the information the patient received about LDKT was associated with a higher likelihood of talking with someone about LDKT and asking for a kidney (adjusted OR = 2.26; CI 1.33-3.83 and 3.89; CI 1.78-8.51). Women and younger patients were more likely to talk with family/friends about LDKT (respectively, adjusted OR = 1.76; CI 1.26-2.47 and 0.97; CI 0.95-0.99) and to ask for a kidney (respectively, adjusted OR = 4.36; CI 2.57-7.40 and 0.97; CI 0.94-0.99). CONCLUSION: Tailored educational programmes considering the patient's stage of readiness and related attitudinal and demographic factors might help patients move towards LDKT.
BACKGROUND: Despite the benefits of live donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) over deceased donor kidney transplantation, patients hesitate to pursue this option. METHODS: A total of 324 transplant-eligible haemodialysis patients attending 14 dialysis facilities in Maryland, Northern Virginia and Southern Pennsylvania were asked about their stages of readiness to pursue LDKT, attitudes towards LKDT and demographics. Logistic regressions were used to test the effect of patients' attitudes and demographics on their stages of readiness to pursue LDKT. RESULTS: Fewer than half of the patients who had heard about LDKT were considering this option. Among patients considering LDKT, 26% had not talked to their loved ones about LDKT and 54% had not asked anyone for a kidney. Concerns about the surgical procedure for the donor were associated with a lower likelihood of considering LDKT (adjusted OR = 0.38; CI 0.18-0.79), talking about LDKT (adjusted OR = 0.38; CI 0.18-0.78) and asking for a kidney (adjusted OR = 0.14; CI 0.06-0.36). Being satisfied with the information the patient received about LDKT was associated with a higher likelihood of talking with someone about LDKT and asking for a kidney (adjusted OR = 2.26; CI 1.33-3.83 and 3.89; CI 1.78-8.51). Women and younger patients were more likely to talk with family/friends about LDKT (respectively, adjusted OR = 1.76; CI 1.26-2.47 and 0.97; CI 0.95-0.99) and to ask for a kidney (respectively, adjusted OR = 4.36; CI 2.57-7.40 and 0.97; CI 0.94-0.99). CONCLUSION: Tailored educational programmes considering the patient's stage of readiness and related attitudinal and demographic factors might help patients move towards LDKT.
Authors: James R Rodrigue; Matthew J Paek; Jesse D Schold; Martha Pavlakis; Didier A Mandelbrot Journal: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Date: 2016-09-08
Authors: P P Reese; J A Shea; R D Bloom; J S Berns; R Grossman; M Joffe; A Huverserian; H I Feldman Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2009-10-21 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Tanjala S Purnell; Neil R Powe; Misty U Troll; Nae-Yuh Wang; Carlton Haywood; Thomas A LaVeist; L Ebony Boulware Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang; Jonathan C Berger; Reside Lorie Ros; Lauren M Kucirka; Neha A Deshpande; Brian J Boyarsky; Robert A Montgomery; Erin C Hall; Nathan T James; Dorry L Segev Journal: Transplantation Date: 2012-06-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Megan L Salter; Natasha Gupta; Elizabeth King; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Andrew H Law; Mara A McAdams-DeMarco; Lucy A Meoni; Bernard G Jaar; Stephen M Sozio; Wen Hong Linda Kao; Rulan S Parekh; Dorry L Segev Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2014-09-11 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Nicole DePasquale; Matthew J Ellis; Debra L Sudan; Patti L Ephraim; Lisa M McElroy; Dinushika Mohottige; Clemontina A Davenport; Xiyuan Zhang; Sarah B Peskoe; Tara S Strigo; Ashley N Cabacungan; Iris Pounds; Jennie A Riley; Margaret Falkovic; L Ebony Boulware Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2021-01-25 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: L Ebony Boulware; Patti L Ephraim; Jessica Ameling; LaPricia Lewis-Boyer; Hamid Rabb; Raquel C Greer; Deidra C Crews; Bernard G Jaar; Priscilla Auguste; Tanjala S Purnell; Julio A Lamprea-Monteleagre; Tope Olufade; Luis Gimenez; Courtney Cook; Tiffany Campbell; Ashley Woodall; Hema Ramamurthi; Cleomontina A Davenport; Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; Matthew R Weir; Donna S Hanes; Nae-Yuh Wang; Helene Vilme; Neil R Powe Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2018-05-03 Impact factor: 2.388