Literature DB >> 19131078

Guidelines for seagrass restoration: importance of habitat selection and donor population, spreading of risks, and ecosystem engineering effects.

M M van Katwijk1, A R Bos, V N de Jonge, L S A M Hanssen, D C R Hermus, D J de Jong.   

Abstract

Large-scale losses of seagrass beds have been reported for decades and lead to numerous restoration programs. From worldwide scientific literature and 20 years of seagrass restoration research in the Wadden Sea, we review and evaluate the traditional guidelines and propose new guidelines for seagrass restoration. Habitat and donor selection are crucial: large differences in survival were found among habitats and among donor populations. The need to preferably transplant in historically confirmed seagrass habitats, and to collect donor material from comparable habitats, were underlined by our results. The importance of sufficient genetic variation of donor material and prevention of genetic isolation by distance was reviewed. The spreading of risks among transplantation sites, which differed in habitat characteristics (or among replicate sites), was positively evaluated. The importance of ecosystem engineering was shown in two ways: seagrass self-facilitation and facilitation by shellfish reefs. Seagrass self-facilitative properties may require a large transplantation scale or additional measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19131078     DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.09.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull        ISSN: 0025-326X            Impact factor:   5.553


  17 in total

1.  Temporal stability in patterns of genetic diversity and structure of a marine foundation species (Zostera marina).

Authors:  L K Reynolds; J J Stachowicz; A R Hughes; S J Kamel; B S Ort; R K Grosberg
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Accounting for Uncertainty and Time Lags in Equivalency Calculations for Offsetting in Aquatic Resources Management Programs.

Authors:  Michael J Bradford
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Seagrasses are negatively affected by organic matter loading and Arenicola marina activity in a laboratory experiment.

Authors:  Laura L Govers; Timon Pieck; Tjeerd J Bouma; Wouter Suykerbuyk; Alfons J P Smolders; Marieke M van Katwijk
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Recovery and Community Succession of the Zostera marina Rhizobiome after Transplantation.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Mary K English; Fiona Tomas; Ryan S Mueller
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Species richness accelerates marine ecosystem restoration in the Coral Triangle.

Authors:  Susan L Williams; Rohani Ambo-Rappe; Christine Sur; Jessica M Abbott; Steven R Limbong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Genetic diversity enhances restoration success by augmenting ecosystem services.

Authors:  Laura K Reynolds; Karen J McGlathery; Michelle Waycott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Resilience of alternative states in spatially extended ecosystems.

Authors:  Ingrid A van de Leemput; Egbert H van Nes; Marten Scheffer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Edge Effects along a Seagrass Margin Result in an Increased Grazing Risk on Posidonia australis Transplants.

Authors:  John Statton; Samuel Gustin-Craig; Kingsley W Dixon; Gary A Kendrick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Conservation of eelgrass (Zostera marina) genetic diversity in a mesocosm-based restoration experiment.

Authors:  Brian S Ort; C Sarah Cohen; Katharyn E Boyer; Laura K Reynolds; Sheh May Tam; Sandy Wyllie-Echeverria
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Burial Duration and Frequency Influences Resilience of Differing Propagule Types in a Subtidal Seagrass, Posidonia australis.

Authors:  Marnie L Campbell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.