Literature DB >> 19130597

Heterochrony in limb evolution: developmental mechanisms and natural selection.

Michael K Richardson1, Sharon M H Gobes, Anne C van Leeuwen, Japke A E Polman, Claude Pieau, Marcelo R Sánchez-Villagra.   

Abstract

The tetrapod limb provides several examples of heterochrony-changes in the timing of developmental events. These include species differences in the sequence of skeletal chondrogenesis, in gene transcription in the developing limbs, and in the relative time at which forelimb and hind limb buds develop. Here, we examine (i) phylogenetic trends in limb heterochrony; (ii) changes in developmental mechanisms that may lead to heterochrony; and (iii) the possible role that heterochrony plays in generating adaptive traits. We analyze the published literature and present preliminary data on turtle (Emys orbicularis) and bat (Rousettus amplexicaudatus) limb development. Teleosts, marsupials, and some urodeles show extreme timing differences between forelimb (or pectoral fin) and hind limb (or pelvic fin) development; this heterochrony may, in some cases, be adaptive. Published data on limb chondrogenesis reveal sequence elements that are strongly conserved (possibly owing to constraints); and others that vary between higher taxa (for unknown reasons). We find little evidence that chondrogenic sequences are modified by selection for limb functional traits. There are a few examples of developmental mechanisms that may be modified under heterochrony to produce adaptive changes in the limb (e.g. some cases of hyperphalangy or limb reduction). In conclusion, numerous examples of limb heterochrony have been recorded. However, few cases are obviously adaptive. Indeed, current data and methodologies make it difficult to identify the developmental changes, or selective pressures, that may underlie limb heterochrony. More integrative studies, including studies of heterochrony within populations, are needed to assess the role of timing shifts in limb evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19130597     DOI: 10.1002/jez.b.21250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol        ISSN: 1552-5007            Impact factor:   2.656


  13 in total

1.  The missing segment of the autopod 1st ray: new insights from a morphometric study of the human hand.

Authors:  Ugo E Pazzaglia; Valeria Sibilia; Lavinia Casati; Andrea G Salvi; Andrea Minini; Marcella Reguzzoni
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-10-14       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Evidence of five digits in embryonic horses and developmental stabilization of tetrapod digit number.

Authors:  Kathryn D Kavanagh; C Scott Bailey; Karen E Sears
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Predator cues alter the timing of developmental events in gastropod embryos.

Authors:  Simon D Rundle; J J Smirthwaite; M W Colbert; J I Spicer
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 4.  Challenges and opportunities in developmental integrative physiology.

Authors:  C A Mueller; J Eme; W W Burggren; R D Roghair; S D Rundle
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 2.320

5.  A standard system to study vertebrate embryos.

Authors:  Ingmar Werneburg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Parent--offspring similarity in the timing of developmental events: an origin of heterochrony?

Authors:  Oliver Tills; Simon D Rundle; John I Spicer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Transcriptional heterochrony in talpid mole autopods.

Authors:  Constanze Bickelmann; Christian Mitgutsch; Michael K Richardson; Rafael Jiménez; Merijn Ag de Bakker; Marcelo R Sánchez-Villagra
Journal:  Evodevo       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.250

8.  Analysis of the dynamics of limb transcriptomes during mouse development.

Authors:  Istvan Gyurján; Bernhard Sonderegger; Felix Naef; Denis Duboule
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 1.978

9.  Sox9 Expression in Amniotes: Species-Specific Differences in the Formation of Digits.

Authors:  Juan A Montero; Carlos I Lorda-Diez; Javier Francisco-Morcillo; Jesus Chimal-Monroy; Juan A Garcia-Porrero; Juan M Hurle
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2017-03-23

10.  Timing of organogenesis support basal position of turtles in the amniote tree of life.

Authors:  Ingmar Werneburg; Marcelo R Sánchez-Villagra
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.