Literature DB >> 19130502

Blind docking of 260 protein-ligand complexes with EADock 2.0.

Aurélien Grosdidier1, Vincent Zoete, Olivier Michielin.   

Abstract

Molecular docking softwares are one of the important tools of modern drug development pipelines. The promising achievements of the last 10 years emphasize the need for further improvement, as reflected by several recent publications (Leach et al., J Med Chem 2006, 49, 5851; Warren et al., J Med Chem 2006, 49, 5912). Our initial approach, EADock, showed a good performance in reproducing the experimental binding modes for a set of 37 different ligand-protein complexes (Grosdidier et al., Proteins 2007, 67, 1010). This article presents recent improvements regarding the scoring and sampling aspects over the initial implementation, as well as a new seeding procedure based on the detection of cavities, opening the door to blind docking with EADock. These enhancements were validated on 260 complexes taken from the high quality Ligand Protein Database [LPDB, (Roche et al., J Med Chem 2001, 44, 3592)]. Two issues were identified: first, the quality of the initial structures cannot be assumed and a manual inspection and/or a search in the literature are likely to be required to achieve the best performance. Second the description of interactions involving metal ions still has to be improved. Nonetheless, a remarkable success rate of 65% was achieved for a large scale blind docking assay, when considering only the top ranked binding mode and a success threshold of 2 A RMSD to the crystal structure. When looking at the five-top ranked binding modes, the success rate increases up to 76%. In a standard local docking assay, success rates of 75 and 83% were obtained, considering only the top ranked binding mode, or the five top binding modes, respectively. Copyright 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19130502     DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  12 in total

1.  Locating binding poses in protein-ligand systems using reconnaissance metadynamics.

Authors:  Pär Söderhjelm; Gareth A Tribello; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Toward prediction of functional protein pockets using blind docking and pocket search algorithms.

Authors:  Csaba Hetényi; David van der Spoel
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Structure-function analyses point to a polynucleotide-accommodating groove essential for APOBEC3A restriction activities.

Authors:  Yannick Bulliard; Iñigo Narvaiza; Alessandro Bertero; Shyam Peddi; Ute F Röhrig; Millán Ortiz; Vincent Zoete; Nataly Castro-Díaz; Priscilla Turelli; Amalio Telenti; Olivier Michielin; Matthew D Weitzman; Didier Trono
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  SwissDock, a protein-small molecule docking web service based on EADock DSS.

Authors:  Aurélien Grosdidier; Vincent Zoete; Olivier Michielin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-05-29       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Anti-prion activity of a panel of aromatic chemical compounds: in vitro and in silico approaches.

Authors:  Natalia C Ferreira; Icaro A Marques; Wesley A Conceição; Bruno Macedo; Clarice S Machado; Alessandra Mascarello; Louise Domeneghini Chiaradia-Delatorre; Rosendo Augusto Yunes; Ricardo José Nunes; Andrew G Hughson; Lynne D Raymond; Pedro G Pascutti; Byron Caughey; Yraima Cordeiro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  AutoDockFR: Advances in Protein-Ligand Docking with Explicitly Specified Binding Site Flexibility.

Authors:  Pradeep Anand Ravindranath; Stefano Forli; David S Goodsell; Arthur J Olson; Michel F Sanner
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Glycosaminoglycans are interactants of Langerin: comparison with gp120 highlights an unexpected calcium-independent binding mode.

Authors:  Eric Chabrol; Alessandra Nurisso; Antoine Daina; Emilie Vassal-Stermann; Michel Thepaut; Eric Girard; Romain R Vivès; Franck Fieschi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Attracting cavities for docking. Replacing the rough energy landscape of the protein by a smooth attracting landscape.

Authors:  Vincent Zoete; Thierry Schuepbach; Christophe Bovigny; Prasad Chaskar; Antoine Daina; Ute F Röhrig; Olivier Michielin
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 9.  Application of the SwissDrugDesign Online Resources in Virtual Screening.

Authors:  Antoine Daina; Vincent Zoete
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  COVID-19: CADD to the rescue.

Authors:  Abdulmujeeb T Onawole; Kazeem O Sulaiman; Temitope U Kolapo; Fatimo O Akinde; Rukayat O Adegoke
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.303

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.