AIM: To compare effects of concomitant radiochemotherapy (RCTh) and radiotherapy (RTh) alone in patients with cervical carcinoma and with 36-months follow-up analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 106 stage IIA-IVA cervical carcinoma women were divided in two groups. RCTh group was treated with teleradiotherapy (50.4 Gy/T), intracavitary brachytherapy (46 Gy), and iv cisplatin (40 mg/m(2)). RTh group was treated with pelvic teletherapy (52-54 Gy/T) and intracavitary brachytherapy (50-55 Gy). RESULTS: In RCTh group absorbed radiation dose was significantly lower (50.4 vs. 52.7 Gy) and the duration of treatment was significantly shorter (45.1 days vs. 47.8 days). There were no statistical differences in both groups in survival (59% in RCTh group vs. 56% in RTh group), response to treatment (86% vs. 90%), local recurrence (42% vs. 49%) metastasis occurrence (21% vs. 17%), anemia (40% vs. 26%), early postradiation reactions in intestines (77% vs. 65%) and bladder (71% vs. 61%) as well as in incidence of rectovaginal (10% vs. 4%) and vesicovaginal formation of fistulas (6% vs. 4%), respectively. There were significant differences between two groups in: nausea (77% vs. 6%), vomiting (65% vs. 3.7%), leucopenia (69% vs. 26%) and thrombocytopenia (35% vs. 9%), and late postradiation bladder effects (94% vs. 74%). RCTh patients with anemia had lower 36-months survival rates (42% vs. 71%), more frequent local recurrences (77% vs. 31%) and metastasis-free survival rates (61% vs. 90%) than RCTh patients without anemia. CONCLUSIONS: RCTh gives better treatment results in patients without than in patients with anemia and higher overall survival rates than RTh in patients without anemia. The only clinical prognostic factor for advance cervical carcinoma is the clinical stage of the disease.
AIM: To compare effects of concomitant radiochemotherapy (RCTh) and radiotherapy (RTh) alone in patients with cervical carcinoma and with 36-months follow-up analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 106 stage IIA-IVA cervical carcinomawomen were divided in two groups. RCTh group was treated with teleradiotherapy (50.4 Gy/T), intracavitary brachytherapy (46 Gy), and iv cisplatin (40 mg/m(2)). RTh group was treated with pelvic teletherapy (52-54 Gy/T) and intracavitary brachytherapy (50-55 Gy). RESULTS: In RCTh group absorbed radiation dose was significantly lower (50.4 vs. 52.7 Gy) and the duration of treatment was significantly shorter (45.1 days vs. 47.8 days). There were no statistical differences in both groups in survival (59% in RCTh group vs. 56% in RTh group), response to treatment (86% vs. 90%), local recurrence (42% vs. 49%) metastasis occurrence (21% vs. 17%), anemia (40% vs. 26%), early postradiation reactions in intestines (77% vs. 65%) and bladder (71% vs. 61%) as well as in incidence of rectovaginal (10% vs. 4%) and vesicovaginal formation of fistulas (6% vs. 4%), respectively. There were significant differences between two groups in: nausea (77% vs. 6%), vomiting (65% vs. 3.7%), leucopenia (69% vs. 26%) and thrombocytopenia (35% vs. 9%), and late postradiation bladder effects (94% vs. 74%). RCTh patients with anemia had lower 36-months survival rates (42% vs. 71%), more frequent local recurrences (77% vs. 31%) and metastasis-free survival rates (61% vs. 90%) than RCTh patients without anemia. CONCLUSIONS: RCTh gives better treatment results in patients without than in patients with anemia and higher overall survival rates than RTh in patients without anemia. The only clinical prognostic factor for advance cervical carcinoma is the clinical stage of the disease.
Authors: A Obermair; R Cheuk; K Horwood; M Janda; B Bachtiary; B Schwanzelberger; A Stoiber; J L Nicklin; L C Perrin; A J Crandon Journal: Cancer Date: 2001-08-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: R Pearcey; M Brundage; P Drouin; J Jeffrey; D Johnston; H Lukka; G MacLean; L Souhami; G Stuart; D Tu Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-02-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J A Stryker; M Bartholomew; D E Velkley; D E Cunningham; R Mortel; G Craycraft; J Shafer Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 1988-01 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: W A Peters; P Y Liu; R J Barrett; R J Stock; B J Monk; J S Berek; L Souhami; P Grigsby; W Gordon; D S Alberts Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: John M Kirwan; Paul Symonds; John A Green; Jayne Tierney; Mandy Collingwood; Christopher J Williams Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: H M Keys; B N Bundy; F B Stehman; L I Muderspach; W E Chafe; C L Suggs; J L Walker; D Gersell Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-04-15 Impact factor: 91.245