Literature DB >> 19130042

[Dynamic instrumentation techniques in early-onset scoliosis].

F Geiger1, M Rauschmann.   

Abstract

Similar to the situation in idiopathic scoliosis, the decision for operative or conservative treatment is based on the progression of the curve. Apart from age and Cobb angle, the rib-vertebral angle difference and rotation of the vertebrae are decisive for the prognosis. Surgery is indicated if, despite consistent brace treatment, a progression of >10 degrees or a Cobb angle of more than 45 degrees is found. Two different dorsal dynamic systems are presently used. With the growing rod technique, one or two rods are fixed to the spine cranially and caudally and are repeatedly"lengthened." Surgery is mandatory at least every 6 months. The Orthobiom system follows a new approach in which a rigid fixation is done in the middle of the curve, while the ends of the rods are linked to flexible connectors that can slide while the child grows. No long-time results are presently available for either system, so no general recommendations can be given.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19130042     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-008-1368-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  19 in total

1.  Curve progression in Risser stage 0 or 1 patients after posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  R F Roberto; J E Lonstein; R B Winter; F Denis
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.324

2.  Scoliosis correction maintenance in skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Is anterior fusion really necessary?

Authors:  D C Burton; M A Asher; S M Lai
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Comparison of single and dual growing rod techniques followed through definitive surgery: a preliminary study.

Authors:  George H Thompson; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Patricia Kostial; Connie Poe-Kochert; Douglas G Armstrong; Jeffrey Roh; Robert Lowe; Marc A Asher; David S Marks
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Progression risk of idiopathic juvenile scoliosis during pubertal growth.

Authors:  Yann Philippe Charles; Jean-Pierre Daures; Vincenzo de Rosa; Alain Diméglio
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Juvenile-onset scoliosis followed up to adulthood: orthopaedic and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Peter D Masso; Ellen Meeropol; Elise Lennon
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.324

6.  Flexible non-fusion scoliosis correction systems reduce intervertebral rotation less than rigid implants and allow growth of the spine: a finite element analysis of different features of orthobiom.

Authors:  A Rohlmann; T Zander; N K Burra; G Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  An innovative technique of vertebral body stapling for the treatment of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a feasibility, safety, and utility study.

Authors:  Randal R Betz; John Kim; Linda P D'Andrea; M J Mulcahey; Rohinton K Balsara; David H Clements
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Dual growing rod technique followed for three to eleven years until final fusion: the effect of frequency of lengthening.

Authors:  Behrooz A Akbarnia; Lee M Breakwell; David S Marks; Richard E McCarthy; Alistair G Thompson; Sarah K Canale; Patricia N Kostial; Anant Tambe; Marc A Asher
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Posterior arthrodesis and instrumentation in the immature (Risser-grade-0) spine in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  J O Sanders; J A Herring; R H Browne
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Juvenile idiopathic scoliosis followed to skeletal maturity.

Authors:  R E Mannherz; R R Betz; M Clancy; H H Steel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Scoliosis: the bent spine].

Authors:  R Radl; M Maafe; S Ziegler
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.087

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.