Literature DB >> 19129274

Comparative airway response to high- versus low-molecular weight agents in occupational asthma.

M-H Dufour1, C Lemière, P Prince, L-P Boulet.   

Abstract

Airway responses to occupational agents in sensitised workers may vary clinically and physiologically. The patterns of change in airway responsiveness, type of response and fall in expiratory flows following laboratory exposure to high- or low-molecular weight agents (HMW and LMW agents, respectively) were compared in sensitised workers. Data on workers who underwent specific inhalation challenges with occupational sensitisers (117 exposed to HMW agents and 130 to LMW agents) were collected from their medical charts. Maximum falls in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) were of similar magnitude for both types of agents. Compared with HMW agents, LMW agents induced more frequently late or dual responses and higher increases in airway responsiveness. After exposure to HMW agents, there was a mean+/-sd reduction in doubling concentrations of methacholine of 0.5+/-1.7 for early responses, compared with 2.8+/-1.2 and 1.4+/-2.0 for late and dual responses, respectively. Isolated early responses were more frequently found in females, smokers, workers with a higher % predicted FEV(1) and higher provocation concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV(1), and in those with longer asthma duration. Workers' characteristics, as well as the type of agent they are sensitised to, may help to predict the type of response after specific inhalation challenge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19129274     DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00120407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  8 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of occupational asthma: an update.

Authors:  Edgardo J Jares; Carlos E Baena-Cagnani; R Maximiliano Gómez
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 2.  Pro/Con debate: Is occupational asthma induced by isocyanates an immunoglobulin E-mediated disease?

Authors:  A V Wisnewski; M Jones
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 5.018

Review 3.  Biomarkers in Occupational Asthma.

Authors:  Javier Dominguez-Ortega; Pilar Barranco; Rosa Rodríguez-Pérez; Santiago Quirce
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.806

4.  Occupational asthma: new low-molecular-weight causal agents, 2000-2010.

Authors:  J A Pralong; A Cartier; O Vandenplas; M Labrecque
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2012-04-04

5.  Comparison between Airway Responses to High versus Low Molecular Weight Compounds in Occupational Asthma.

Authors:  D Talini; F Novelli; E Bacci; F L Dente; M De Santis; A Di Franco; L Melosini; B Vagaggini; P L Paggiaro
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2011-05-25

Review 6.  Progress in Occupational Asthma.

Authors:  Angelica I Tiotiu; Silviya Novakova; Marina Labor; Alexander Emelyanov; Stefan Mihaicuta; Plamena Novakova; Denislava Nedeva
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Bronchial Response to High and Low Molecular Weight Occupational Inhalant Allergens.

Authors:  Agnieszka Lipińska-Ojrzanowska; Ewa Nowakowska-Świrta; Marta Wiszniewska; Jolanta Walusiak-Skorupa
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Immunol Res       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 5.764

8.  Do Low Molecular Weight Agents Cause More Severe Asthma than High Molecular Weight Agents?

Authors:  Olga Meca; María-Jesús Cruz; Mónica Sánchez-Ortiz; Francisco-Javier González-Barcala; Iñigo Ojanguren; Xavier Munoz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.