Literature DB >> 19129106

Environmental heterogeneity, genotype-by-environment interactions and the reliability of sexual traits as indicators of mate quality.

A D Higginson1, T Reader.   

Abstract

Exaggerated sexual displays are often supposed to indicate the indirect benefits females may receive from sexual reproduction with displaying males, but empirical evidence for positive relationships between the genetic quality and sexual trait quality is scant. The explanation for this might lie in the fact that mixing of reproductive individuals whose development has been influenced by genotype-by-environment interactions (GEIs) can blur the relationship between the individual male genetic quality and phenotype as perceived by females. Strong GEIs can generate an ecological crossover, where different genotypes are superior in environments that are separated either in space or time. Here, we use a stochastic simulation model to show that even a weak GEI, which does not generate an obvious ecological crossover, can neutralize or even reverse the relationship between genetic quality and sexual trait size in the presence of environmental heterogeneity during development. Our model highlights the importance of developmental selection in evolution of traits and allows us to predict the situations in which sexual displays might not be reliable indicators of genetic quality.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19129106      PMCID: PMC2679080          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  9 in total

1.  Sexually selected traits and adult survival: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M D Jennions; A P Møller; M Petrie
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.875

2.  Testing the genetics underlying the co-evolution of mate choice and ornament in the wild.

Authors:  Anna Qvarnström; Jon E Brommer; Lars Gustafsson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Genotype x environment interaction for male attractiveness in an acoustic moth: evidence for plasticity and canalization.

Authors:  A M Danielson-François; J K Kelly; M D Greenfield
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  What is genetic quality?

Authors:  John Hunt; Luc F Bussière; Michael D Jennions; Robert Brooks
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Genotype-environment interactions and the maintenance of polygenic variation.

Authors:  J H Gillespie; M Turelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Mate selection-a selection for a handicap.

Authors:  A Zahavi
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Katja Heubel
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-07-07       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Developmental stress, social rank and song complexity in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris).

Authors:  K A Spencer; K L Buchanan; A R Goldsmith; C K Catchpole
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Environmental coupling of selection and heritability limits evolution.

Authors:  A J Wilson; J M Pemberton; J G Pilkington; D W Coltman; D V Mifsud; T H Clutton-Brock; L E B Kruuk
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 8.029

  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  'Out of tune': consequences of inbreeding on bird song.

Authors:  Raïssa A de Boer; Marcel Eens; Wendt Müller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Females can solve the problem of low signal reliability by assessing multiple male traits.

Authors:  Abigail K Wegehaupt; William E Wagner
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Genotype-by-environment interactions for female mate choice of male cuticular hydrocarbons in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Fiona C Ingleby; John Hunt; David J Hosken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Assortative mating in fallow deer reduces the strength of sexual selection.

Authors:  Mary E Farrell; Elodie Briefer; Tom Hayden; Alan G McElligott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  No evidence for heritability of male mating latency or copulation duration across social environments in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Michelle L Taylor; Jonathan P Evans; Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Condition-dependent trade-offs between sexual traits, body condition and immunity: the effect of novel habitats.

Authors:  Maider Iglesias-Carrasco; Megan L Head; Michael D Jennions; Carlos Cabido
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Environmental change mediates mate choice for an extended phenotype, but not for mate quality.

Authors:  Megan L Head; Rebecca J Fox; Iain Barber
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 8.  How urbanization affects sexual communication.

Authors:  Justa L Heinen-Kay; Adam D Kay; Marlene Zuk
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.