Literature DB >> 19128938

The variability in minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptomatic state values did not have an impact on treatment effect estimates.

Florence Tubach1, Bruno Giraudeau, Philippe Ravaud.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) are cutoffs dichotomizing continuous values into variables such as improved or not improved (MCID), or in an acceptable state or not in an acceptable state (PASS), allowing to report the success rate (proportion of patients improved or in an acceptable state) in trial arms. The objective was to investigate the influence of the choice of MCID and/or PASS values on the difference in success rate between arms. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: Analytic study was carried out. In two hypothetic trials (prespecified mean and standard deviation (SD) for control arm score, effect sizes [ES] of 0.25 and 0.5), we calculated the success rates in control and experimental arms for different MCID and PASS values, and derived the difference in success rates between arms.
RESULTS: For a 0-100 score and MCID values from -40 to -10, the difference in success rate between arms ranges from 7.9% to 9.9% (ES=0.25) and from 15.9% to 19.7% (ES=0.50). For PASS values from 20 to 50, the difference in success rate between arms ranges from 7.1% to 9.9% (ES=0.25) and from 15.6% to 19.7% (ES=0.50).
CONCLUSION: The MCID or PASS value has a low impact on the difference in the success rate between the arms in a trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19128938     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  6 in total

1.  Therapeutic effects of prolotherapy with intra-articular dextrose injection in patients with moderate knee osteoarthritis: a single-arm study with 6 months follow up.

Authors:  Fariba Eslamian; Bahman Amouzandeh
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.346

2.  Prevalence of diabetes treatment effect modifiers: the external validity of trials to older adults.

Authors:  Carlos O Weiss; Cynthia M Boyd; Jennifer L Wolff; Bruce Leff
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  Which Preoperative Factors are Associated with Not Attaining Acceptable Levels of Pain and Function After TKA? Findings from an International Multicenter Study.

Authors:  James W Connelly; Vincent P Galea; Pakdee Rojanasopondist; Christian Skovgaard Nielsen; Charles R Bragdon; Andreas Kappel; James I Huddleston; Henrik Malchau; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Factors Associated With Clinical Responses to Spinal Manipulation in Patients With Non-specific Thoracic Back Pain: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Mégane Pasquier; James J Young; Arnaud Lardon; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-06

5.  Excellent PROM results after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty with no postoperative restrictions: a cohort study validation of fast-track surgery without postoperative restrictions.

Authors:  Aksel Paulsen; Ane Djuv; Jarle Ludvigsen; Ingvild Dalen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients 1 year postoperatively.

Authors:  Aksel Paulsen; Ewa M Roos; Alma B Pedersen; Søren Overgaard
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 3.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.