Literature DB >> 19128605

The microdébrider and its complications in endoscopic surgery for nasal polyposis.

Mustafa Cenk Ecevit1, Semih Sutay, Taner Kemal Erdag.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the rate of complications of the microdébrider in endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for nasal polyposis. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: A retrospective study was done on the complications occurring during ESS for nasal polyposis and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) without nasal polyps in which a microdébrider had been used on 275 sides of 139 patients in a tertiary university practice setting.
RESULTS: The mean sinus opacification scores in computed tomography, according to the Lund-Mackay staging system, were 9.2 +/- 2.28 for the nasal polyposis group and 4.8 +/- 1.54 for the CRS group. There was one major complication, a cerebrospinal fistula that was repaired during the surgery. The minor and major complication rates for the nasal polyposis group were 11.8% and 0.5%, respectively. The minor complication rate for the CRS group was 4%.
CONCLUSION: Knowledge of endonasal anatomy, surgical experience, a bloodless operating field, and being careful about every colour change during the operation are the fundamental essentials for lowering the complication rate. With its lower incidence of complications, even in high-risk cases such as nasal polyposis, a microdébrider provides acceptable complication rates in ESS. Also, the severity of the disease is the main determining factor for the final complication rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19128605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 1916-0208


  5 in total

1.  Powered versus conventional endoscopic sinus surgery instruments in management of sinonasal polyposis.

Authors:  Magdy E Saafan; Sameh M Ragab; Osama A Albirmawy; Hosam S Elsherif
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Complications in endonasal sinus surgery: a 5-year retrospective study of 2,596 patients.

Authors:  Vanessa Siedek; E Pilzweger; C Betz; Alexander Berghaus; A Leunig
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Rainer K Weber; Werner Hosemann
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

Review 4.  Danger points, complications and medico-legal aspects in endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  W Hosemann; C Draf
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-13

Review 5.  A review of the revisions and complications management procedure in sinus surgery.

Authors:  Sara Khademi; Aida Kazemi; Reza Divanbeigi; Mohamadreza Afzalzadeh
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2022-03-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.