Literature DB >> 19127990

The Groningen Protocol: is it necessary? Is it scientific? Is it ethical?

Frank A Chervenak1, Laurence B McCullough, Birgit Arabin.   

Abstract

AIM: To explore whether the Groningen Protocol is clinically necessary, scientific, and ethically justified.
RESULTS: The Groningen Protocol is clinically unnecessary because the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment from seriously ill infants is already ethically accepted globally without the need for the Protocol and because spina bifida, to which the Protocol has been most often applied, can be detected by ultrasound before viability, affording pregnant women the opportunity of termination of pregnancy. The Groningen Protocol is unscientific because it does not meet the accepted standards of evidence-based reasoning concerning the four clinical criteria for its application. The Groningen Protocol is unethical because it does not meet the standards of argument-based ethics in defining its four clinical criteria.
CONCLUSIONS: The Groningen Protocol is clinically unnecessary, unscientific, and unethical. Physicians should condemn its use. The Dutch Association of Paediatrics should revoke its approval and adoption of the Groningen Protocol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19127990     DOI: 10.1515/JPM.2009.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinat Med        ISSN: 0300-5577            Impact factor:   1.901


  3 in total

Review 1.  The Right to Die in Chronic Disorders of Consciousness: Can We Avoid the Slippery Slope Argument?

Authors:  Rocco Salvatore Calabrò; Antonino Naro; Rosaria De Luca; Margherita Russo; Lory Caccamo; Alfredo Manuli; Alessia Bramanti; Placido Bramanti
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-01

2.  Involuntary euthanasia of severely ill newborns: is the Groningen Protocol really dangerous?

Authors:  P Voultsos; F Chatzinikolaou
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 0.471

3.  Attitudes among the general Austrian population towards neonatal euthanasia: a survey.

Authors:  Lena Goldnagl; Wolfgang Freidl; Willibald J Stronegger
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.652

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.