Literature DB >> 19127743

Selection, characterization, and CDR shuffling of naive llama single-domain antibodies selected against auxin and their cross-reactivity with auxinic herbicides from four chemical families.

Claudia Sheedy1, Kerrm Y F Yau, Tomoko Hirama, C Roger MacKenzie, J Christopher Hall.   

Abstract

Indoleacetic acid (IAA)-binding single-domain antibodies (sdAbs) were isolated from a naive phage-display library constructed from the heavy chain antibody repertoire of a Ilama. The highest-affinity sdAb isolated (CSF2A) had a K(D) of 5-20 microM for two IAA-protein conjugates and a K(D) of 20 microM for free IAA. This sdAb also bound to a synthetic auxin analogue, 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), and to six auxinic herbicides (K(D) values of 0.5-2 mM), but not to serotonin and tryptophan, which are structurally similar to IAA but have no auxinic activity. To understand how sdAb CSF2A binds IAA and to determine which complementary-determining region(s) (CDR) participate(s) most in binding IAA, CSF2A was shuffled with four other sdAb clones by staggered extension process (StEP). After panning against IAA, two shuffled sdAbs were found: sdAb CSB1A, which originated from three different parental clones, and sdAb CSE8A, derived from two parental clones. These shuffled sdAbs and CSF2A were each fused to the B subunit of the Escherichia coli verotoxin, resulting in the formation of the pentamerized sdAbs V2NCSB1A, V2NCSE8A, and V2NCSF2A, which were analyzed by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) along with the sdAbs previously isolated. The shuffled clones had affinity for IAA (20 microM) similar to that of the highest affinity parental clone CSF2A, but much lower affinity for the auxinic herbicides. CDR2 was instrumental in binding IAA, whereas hydrophobic CDR3 was important for binding the auxinic herbicides. A novel SPR methodology is also described for specific immobilization of pentamerized sdAbs, allowing determination of K(D) values of Ab interaction with underivatized, low molecular weight haptens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 19127743     DOI: 10.1021/jf060219i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  7 in total

1.  Isolation of alpaca anti-hapten heavy chain single domain antibodies for development of sensitive immunoassay.

Authors:  Hee-Joo Kim; Mark R McCoy; Zuzana Majkova; Julie E Dechant; Shirley J Gee; Sofia Tabares-da Rosa; Gualberto G González-Sapienza; Bruce D Hammock
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Competitive selection from single domain antibody libraries allows isolation of high-affinity antihapten antibodies that are not favored in the llama immune response.

Authors:  Sofia Tabares-da Rosa; Martin Rossotti; Carmen Carleiza; Federico Carrión; Otto Pritsch; Ki Chang Ahn; Jerold A Last; Bruce D Hammock; Gualberto González-Sapienza
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 3.  VHH antibodies: emerging reagents for the analysis of environmental chemicals.

Authors:  Candace S Bever; Jie-Xian Dong; Natalia Vasylieva; Bogdan Barnych; Yongliang Cui; Zhen-Lin Xu; Bruce D Hammock; Shirley J Gee
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 4.  Biotechnological applications of recombinant single-domain antibody fragments.

Authors:  Ario de Marco
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 5.328

5.  Extensive sequence and structural evolution of Arginase 2 inhibitory antibodies enabled by an unbiased approach to affinity maturation.

Authors:  Denice T Y Chan; Lesley Jenkinson; Stuart W Haynes; Mark Austin; Agata Diamandakis; Daniel Burschowsky; Chitra Seewooruthun; Alexandra Addyman; Sebastian Fiedler; Stephanie Ryman; Jessica Whitehouse; Louise H Slater; Ellen Gowans; Yoko Shibata; Michelle Barnard; Robert W Wilkinson; Tristan J Vaughan; Sarah V Holt; Vincenzo Cerundolo; Mark D Carr; Maria A T Groves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A Two-Step Approach for the Design and Generation of Nanobodies.

Authors:  Hanna J Wagner; Sarah Wehrle; Etienne Weiss; Marco Cavallari; Wilfried Weber
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Nanobody Technology for Mycotoxin Detection in the Field of Food Safety: Current Status and Prospects.

Authors:  Ting He; Jiang Zhu; Yao Nie; Rui Hu; Ting Wang; Peiwu Li; Qi Zhang; Yunhuang Yang
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-29       Impact factor: 4.546

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.