Literature DB >> 19127473

An application of linear mixed effects model to assess the agreement between two methods with replicated observations.

Anuradha Roy1.   

Abstract

We study the problem of assessing the agreement between two methods with any number of replicated observations using linear mixed effects (LME) model with Kronecker product covariance structure in a doubly multivariate set-up. This method can also be used in the case of unbalanced designs when number of replications on each patient is unequal, as well as when the number of replications on each patient by respective methods is unequal. The model is implemented using the MIXED procedure of SAS. We demonstrate our proposed method with three real datasets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19127473     DOI: 10.1080/10543400802535141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biopharm Stat        ISSN: 1054-3406            Impact factor:   1.051


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Finis Swimsense® and the Garmin Swim™ activity monitors for swimming performance and stroke kinematics analysis.

Authors:  Robert Mooney; Leo R Quinlan; Gavin Corley; Alan Godfrey; Conor Osborough; Gearóid ÓLaighin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Method comparison of automated matching software-assisted cone-beam CT and stereoscopic kilovoltage x-ray positional verification image-guided radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  Clifton D Fuller; Todd J Scarbrough; Jan-Jakob Sonke; Coen R N Rasch; Mehee Choi; Joe Y Ting; Samuel J Wang; Niko Papanikolaou; David I Rosenthal
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Assessing method agreement for paired repeated binary measurements administered by multiple raters.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Nan Lin; Jordan D Oberhaus; Michael S Avidan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Assessment of DNA methylation status in early stages of breast cancer development.

Authors:  A Q van Hoesel; Y Sato; D A Elashoff; R R Turner; A E Giuliano; J M Shamonki; P J K Kuppen; C J H van de Velde; D S B Hoon
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Quantification of myocardial perfusion with self-gated cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Devavrat Likhite; Ganesh Adluru; Nan Hu; Chris McGann; Edward DiBella
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  Comparison of measurement methods with a mixed effects procedure accounting for replicated evaluations (COM3PARE): method comparison algorithm implementation for head and neck IGRT positional verification.

Authors:  Anuradha Roy; Clifton D Fuller; David I Rosenthal; Charles R Thomas
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  Comparison Between Non-Invasive Methane Measurement Techniques in Cattle.

Authors:  Jagoba Rey; Raquel Atxaerandio; Roberto Ruiz; Eva Ugarte; Oscar González-Recio; Aser Garcia-Rodriguez; Idoia Goiri
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Awake Rabbits Allows Identification of the Visual Streak, a Comparison with Histology.

Authors:  Arnold Lavaud; Petr Soukup; Louise Martin; Sonja Hartnack; Simon Pot
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Using multiple agreement methods for continuous repeated measures data: a tutorial for practitioners.

Authors:  Richard A Parker; Charles Scott; Vanda Inácio; Nathaniel T Stevens
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.615

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.