Literature DB >> 19127283

A simple pharmacokinetic model to characterize exposure of Americans to di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate.

Matthew Lorber1, Jürgen Angerer, Holger M Koch.   

Abstract

A simple pharmacokinetic model to predict concentrations of metabolites of di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate, DEHP, in humans starting from intakes of DEHP was developed and applied. This model predicts serum and urine concentrations of five DEHP metabolites: MEHP, 5oxo-MEHP, 5OH-MEHP, 5cx-MEPP, and 2cx-MMHP. The model was calibrated using data from an individual who dosed himself with 48.5 mg DEHP, and then took blood and urine samples over a 44-h period. The calibrated model was then used in two applications: one on a second set of individuals whose exposure to DEHP was through PVC medical devices in a blood platelet donation procedure, and one on background exposures in the United States (US). Based on 2001/02 NHANES data, median US background urine concentrations of MEHP, 5OH-MEHP, and 5oxo-MEHP are 4.1, 20.1, and 14.0 microg/l, respectively. Creatine and urine volume-correction approaches were used to backcalculate an average daily dose of DEHP in the range of 0.6-2.2 microg/kg per day. A "background cohort" including 8 individuals and 57 complete days of urination were assumed to be exposed to1.5 microg/kg per day, spread out in equal doses of 0.3 microg/kg per day at 0900, 1200, 1500, 1800, and 2100 h. The average predicted urine concentrations were 4.6, 15.9, and 9.4 microg/l for MEHP, 5OH-MEHP, and 5oxo-MEHP. These are similar, but the two secondary metabolites are slightly lower than medians found in NHANES. This slight difference between the NHANES results and the background simulations could have been due to differences in metabolism between the individual who provided the calibration data (61-year-old Caucasian male) and the general US population. Another explanation evaluated was that urine concentrations further from the time of exposure may have larger disparities between MEHP and the two secondary metabolites as compared with concentrations measured closer to the time of exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19127283     DOI: 10.1038/jes.2008.74

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1559-0631            Impact factor:   5.563


  16 in total

1.  Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of human and animal evidence of prenatal diethylhexyl phthalate exposure and changes in male anogenital distance.

Authors:  David C Dorman; Weihsueh Chiu; Barbara F Hales; Russ Hauser; Kamin J Johnson; Ellen Mantus; Susan Martel; Karen A Robinson; Andrew A Rooney; Ruthann Rudel; Sheela Sathyanarayana; Susan L Schantz; Katrina M Waters
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 6.393

2.  A systematic approach for identifying and presenting mechanistic evidence in human health assessments.

Authors:  Mary E Kushman; Andrew D Kraft; Kathryn Z Guyton; Weihsueh A Chiu; Susan L Makris; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 3.271

3.  Reconstruction of bisphenol A intake using a simple pharmacokinetic model.

Authors:  Krista L Y Christensen; Matthew Lorber; Xiaoyun Ye; Antonia M Calafat
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 5.563

4.  Dietary intake is associated with phthalate body burden in a nationally representative sample.

Authors:  Justin A Colacino; T Robert Harris; Arnold Schecter
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Characterization of Urinary Phthalate Metabolites Among Custodians.

Authors:  Jennifer M Cavallari; Nancy J Simcox; Sara Wakai; Chensheng Lu; Jennifer L Garza; Martin Cherniack
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2015-08-02

6.  Dose reconstruction of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate using a simple pharmacokinetic model.

Authors:  Matthew Lorber; Antonia M Calafat
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Correcting for the influence of sampling conditions on biomarkers of exposure to phenols and phthalates: a 2-step standardization method based on regression residuals.

Authors:  Marion Mortamais; Cécile Chevrier; Claire Philippat; Claire Petit; Antonia M Calafat; Xiaoyun Ye; Manori J Silva; Christian Brambilla; Marinus J C Eijkemans; Marie-Aline Charles; Sylvaine Cordier; Rémy Slama
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 5.984

8.  Relationship of urinary phthalate metabolites with serum thyroid hormones in pregnant women and their newborns: a prospective birth cohort in Taiwan.

Authors:  Fu-Chen Kuo; Sheng-Wen Su; Chia-Fang Wu; Meng-Chuan Huang; Jentaie Shiea; Bai-Hsiu Chen; Yi-Ling Chen; Ming-Tsang Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Exposure Estimation for Risk Assessment of the Phthalate Incident in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chu-Chih Chen; Shu-Li Wang; Ming-Tsang Wu; Yin-Han Wang; Po-Chin Huang; Bai-Hsiun Chen; Chien-Wen Sun; Chi-Kung Ho; Yang-Chih Shih; Ming-Neng Shiu; Wen-Harn Pan; Mei-Lien Chen; Ching-Chang Lee; Chao A Hsiung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Urinary Phthalate Metabolites and Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress in a Mexican-American Cohort: Variability in Early and Late Pregnancy.

Authors:  Nina Holland; Karen Huen; Vy Tran; Kelly Street; Brian Nguyen; Asa Bradman; Brenda Eskenazi
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2016-03-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.