Literature DB >> 19127282

Global similarity with local differences in linkage disequilibrium between the Dutch and HapMap-CEU populations.

Luba Pardo1, Zoltán Bochdanovits, Eco de Geus, Jouke J Hottenga, Patrick Sullivan, Danielle Posthuma, Brenda W J H Penninx, Dorret Boomsma, Peter Heutink.   

Abstract

The HapMap project has facilitated the selection of tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (tagSNPs) for genome-wide association studies (GWAS) under the assumption that linkage disequilibrium (LD) in the HapMap populations is similar to the populations under investigation. Earlier reports support this assumption, although in most of these studies only a few loci were evaluated. We compared pair-wise LD and LD block structure across autosomes between the Dutch population and the CEU-HapMap reference panel. The impact of sampling distribution on the estimation of LD blocks was studied by bootstrapping. A high Pearson correlation (genome-wide; 0.93) between pair-wise r(2) for the Dutch and the CEU populations was found, indicating that tagSNPs from the CEU-HapMap panel capture common variation in the Dutch population. However, some genomic regions exhibited, significantly lower correlation than the genome-wide estimate. This might decrease the validity of HapMap tagSNPs in these regions and the power of GWAS. The LD block structure differed considerably between the Dutch and CEU-HapMap populations. This was not explained by demographic differences between the CEU and Dutch samples, as testing for population stratification was not significant. We also found that sampling variation had a large effect on the estimation of LD blocks, as shown by the bootstrapping analysis. Thus, in small samples, most of the observed differences in LD blocks between populations are most likely the result of sampling variation. This poor concordance in LD block structure suggests that large samples are required for robust estimations of local LD block structure in populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19127282      PMCID: PMC2947108          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  38 in total

1.  A haplotype map of the human genome.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  An evaluation of HapMap sample size and tagging SNP performance in large-scale empirical and simulated data sets.

Authors:  Eleftheria Zeggini; William Rayner; Andrew P Morris; Andrew T Hattersley; Mark Walker; Graham A Hitman; Panos Deloukas; Lon R Cardon; Mark I McCarthy
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2005-10-30       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  The effect of genetic drift in a young genetically isolated population.

Authors:  L M Pardo; Ian MacKay; Ben Oostra; Cornelia M van Duijn; Yurii S Aulchenko
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.670

Review 4.  Evaluating HapMap SNP data transferability in a large-scale genotyping project involving 175 cancer-associated genes.

Authors:  Gloria Ribas; Anna González-Neira; Antonio Salas; Roger L Milne; Ana Vega; Begoña Carracedo; Emilio González; Eva Barroso; Lara P Fernández; Patricio Yankilevich; Mercedes Robledo; Angel Carracedo; Javier Benítez
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  A worldwide survey of haplotype variation and linkage disequilibrium in the human genome.

Authors:  Donald F Conrad; Mattias Jakobsson; Graham Coop; Xiaoquan Wen; Jeffrey D Wall; Noah A Rosenberg; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  The portability of tagSNPs across populations: a worldwide survey.

Authors:  Anna González-Neira; Xiayi Ke; Oscar Lao; Francesc Calafell; Arcadi Navarro; David Comas; Howard Cann; Suzannah Bumpstead; Jilur Ghori; Sarah Hunt; Panos Deloukas; Ian Dunham; Lon R Cardon; Jaume Bertranpetit
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-02-08       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  A comparison of phasing algorithms for trios and unrelated individuals.

Authors:  Jonathan Marchini; David Cutler; Nick Patterson; Matthew Stephens; Eleazar Eskin; Eran Halperin; Shin Lin; Zhaohui S Qin; Heather M Munro; Goncalo R Abecasis; Peter Donnelly
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  An utter refutation of the "fundamental theorem of the HapMap".

Authors:  Joseph D Terwilliger; Tero Hiekkalinna
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  TAMAL: an integrated approach to choosing SNPs for genetic studies of human complex traits.

Authors:  Bradley M Hemminger; Billy Saelim; Patrick F Sullivan
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  An evaluation of the performance of tag SNPs derived from HapMap in a Caucasian population.

Authors:  Alexandre Montpetit; Mari Nelis; Philippe Laflamme; Reedik Magi; Xiayi Ke; Maido Remm; Lon Cardon; Thomas J Hudson; Andres Metspalu
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  7 in total

1.  Dissecting the genetic make-up of North-East Sardinia using a large set of haploid and autosomal markers.

Authors:  Luba M Pardo; Giovanna Piras; Rosanna Asproni; Kristiaan J van der Gaag; Attilio Gabbas; Andres Ruiz-Linares; Peter de Knijff; Maria Monne; Patrizia Rizzu; Peter Heutink
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  A common polymorphism in the ABCB1 gene is associated with side effects of PGP-dependent antidepressants in a large naturalistic Dutch cohort.

Authors:  P M Bet; E C Verbeek; Y Milaneschi; D B M Straver; T Uithuisje; M R Bevova; J G Hugtenburg; P Heutink; B W J H Penninx; W J G Hoogendijk
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.550

3.  Shades of gray: a comparison of linkage disequilibrium between Hutterites and Europeans.

Authors:  Emma E Thompson; Ying Sun; Dan Nicolae; Carole Ober
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  Conditional and joint multiple-SNP analysis of GWAS summary statistics identifies additional variants influencing complex traits.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Teresa Ferreira; Andrew P Morris; Sarah E Medland; Pamela A F Madden; Andrew C Heath; Nicholas G Martin; Grant W Montgomery; Michael N Weedon; Ruth J Loos; Timothy M Frayling; Mark I McCarthy; Joel N Hirschhorn; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  A fine-mapping study of 7 top scoring genes from a GWAS for major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Eva C Verbeek; Ingrid M C Bakker; Marianna R Bevova; Zoltán Bochdanovits; Patrizia Rizzu; David Sondervan; Gonneke Willemsen; Eco J de Geus; Johannes H Smit; Brenda W Penninx; Dorret I Boomsma; Witte J G Hoogendijk; Peter Heutink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Linkage disequilibrium and haplotype block patterns in popcorn populations.

Authors:  Andréa Carla Bastos Andrade; José Marcelo Soriano Viana; Helcio Duarte Pereira; Vitor Batista Pinto; Fabyano Fonseca E Silva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Regional replication of association with refractive error on 15q14 and 15q25 in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study cohort.

Authors:  Claire L Simpson; Robert Wojciechowski; Stephanie S Yee; Poorva Soni; Joan E Bailey-Wilson; Dwight Stambolian
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2013-11-02       Impact factor: 2.367

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.