| Literature DB >> 19126873 |
Yachiyo Kuwatsuka1, Koichi Miyamura, Ritsuro Suzuki, Masaharu Kasai, Atsuo Maruta, Hiroyasu Ogawa, Ryuji Tanosaki, Satoshi Takahashi, Kyuhei Koda, Kazuhiro Yago, Yoshiko Atsuta, Takashi Yoshida, Hisashi Sakamaki, Yoshihisa Kodera.
Abstract
We analyzed 338 adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with t(8;21) and inv(16) undergoing stem cell transplantation (SCT) who were registered in the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation database. At 3 years, overall survival (OS) of patients with t(8;21) and inv(16) was 50% and 72%, respectively (P= .002). Although no difference was observed when restricted to allogeneic SCT in first complete remission (CR; 84% and 74%), OS of patients with t(8;21) and inv(16) undergoing allogeneic SCT in second or third CR (45% and 86% at 3 years; P= .008) was different. OS was not different between patients in first CR who received allogeneic SCT and those who received autologous SCT for both t(8;21) AML (84% vs 77%; P= .49) and inv(16) AML (74% vs 59%; P= .86). Patients with inv(16) not in CR did better after allogeneic SCT than those with t(8;21) (70% and 18%; P= .03). Patients with t(8;21) and inv(16) should be managed differently as to the application of SCT. SCT in first CR is not necessarily recommended for inv(16). For t(8;21) patients in first CR, a prospective trial is needed to clarify the significance of autologous SCT and allogeneic SCT over chemotherapy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19126873 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-03-145862
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood ISSN: 0006-4971 Impact factor: 22.113