BACKGROUND: We tested whether a brief psychological intervention could prevent anxiety or depressive disorders among newly diagnosed cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients free of anxiety or depressive disorder were randomised to receive immediate intervention (start of cancer treatment), delayed intervention (8 weeks after starting treatment) or usual care. They were stratified according to risk of developing anxiety or depressive disorders. Primary outcome was measured using a standardised psychiatric interview to detect any anxiety or depressive disorder at 6 and 12 months following the cancer diagnosis. Analyses used conditional odds logistic regression models adjusting for age, gender, concerns and past history to compare outcome of all intervention patients with usual care. RESULTS:A total of 465 patients were recruited. In all, 313 (79%) of the 397 well enough to be interviewed completed the study. At 12 months, there was no difference between the groups receiving the intervention and usual care [odds ratio (OR) = 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-1.17, P = 0.17]. In high-risk patients, those who received the intervention were less likely to develop an anxiety or depressive disorder compared with those who received usual care (OR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.29-1.00, P = 0.050). In low-risk patients, there was no difference (OR = 1.50, 95% CI 0.51-4.43, P = 0.47). CONCLUSION: A brief intervention, delivered by nonspecialists, promoted adjustment among newly diagnosed cancer patients at high risk of developing anxiety or depressive disorders.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: We tested whether a brief psychological intervention could prevent anxiety or depressive disorders among newly diagnosed cancerpatients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients free of anxiety or depressive disorder were randomised to receive immediate intervention (start of cancer treatment), delayed intervention (8 weeks after starting treatment) or usual care. They were stratified according to risk of developing anxiety or depressive disorders. Primary outcome was measured using a standardised psychiatric interview to detect any anxiety or depressive disorder at 6 and 12 months following the cancer diagnosis. Analyses used conditional odds logistic regression models adjusting for age, gender, concerns and past history to compare outcome of all intervention patients with usual care. RESULTS: A total of 465 patients were recruited. In all, 313 (79%) of the 397 well enough to be interviewed completed the study. At 12 months, there was no difference between the groups receiving the intervention and usual care [odds ratio (OR) = 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-1.17, P = 0.17]. In high-risk patients, those who received the intervention were less likely to develop an anxiety or depressive disorder compared with those who received usual care (OR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.29-1.00, P = 0.050). In low-risk patients, there was no difference (OR = 1.50, 95% CI 0.51-4.43, P = 0.47). CONCLUSION: A brief intervention, delivered by nonspecialists, promoted adjustment among newly diagnosed cancerpatients at high risk of developing anxiety or depressive disorders.
Authors: Tim Luckett; Phyllis N Butow; Madeleine T King; Mayumi Oguchi; Gaynor Heading; Nadine A Hackl; Nicole Rankin; Melanie A Price Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2010-07-02 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Lata K McGinn; Anna Van Meter; Ian Kronish; Jessica Gashin; Karen Burns; Natalie Kil; Thomas G McGinn Journal: Cognit Ther Res Date: 2019-02-12
Authors: Patricia Moreno-Peral; Sonia Conejo-Cerón; Maria Rubio-Valera; Anna Fernández; Desirée Navas-Campaña; Alberto Rodríguez-Morejón; Emma Motrico; Alina Rigabert; Juan de Dios Luna; Carlos Martín-Pérez; Antonina Rodríguez-Bayón; María Isabel Ballesta-Rodríguez; Juan Vicente Luciano; Juan Ángel Bellón Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Susanne Singer; Anna Brown; Jens Einenkel; Johann Hauss; Andreas Hinz; Andrea Klein; Kirsten Papsdorf; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Elmar Brähler Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2010-09-19 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Karen L Weihs; Joshua F Wiley; Catherine M Crespi; Jennifer L Krull; Annette L Stanton Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2017-07-26 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Kelly M Trevino; Charlotte Healy; Peter Martin; Beverly Canin; Karl Pillemer; Jo Anne Sirey; M Cary Reid Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 3.599