INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to investigate how patients, general practitioners (GPs) and orthopaedic trainees, feel about the proposed governmental changes to reduce orthopaedic out-patient clinics by having GPs and specialist nurses follow-up postoperative orthopaedic patients in the community. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The design was a cross-sectional questionnaire study including a teaching hospital and general practitioners in the Norfolk primary care trust. Participants were 73 orthopaedic postoperative patients who attended out-patients over a 1-week period in July 2007 who all responded. Of 250 GPs, 239 responded. Of 38 orthopaedic trainees at the level of senior house officer (post MRCS) and specialist registrar (Eastern Deanery Rotation and Pott Rotation), 30 responded RESULTS: Of the 73 patients, 56 (77%) felt the surgeon was best suited to manage them postoperatively. Of these, 47 felt that it was very important that the surgical team saw them postoperatively. Also, 53 felt that their GP did not have sufficient knowledge and experience to deal with their current orthopaedic problem adequately. Only 12 GPs of 239 (5%) felt very confident assessing postoperative patients. Inadequate resources available to diagnose and treat postoperative complications was noted by 74% as the reason for not performing follow-up in primary care, and only 18% felt they should follow-up postoperative patients. All trainees felt that following up their own postoperative patients was important to their training. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients, GPs, and orthopaedic trainees had serious doubts about the proposed governmental changes to reduce orthopaedic out-patient clinics by having GPs and specialist nurses follow-up postoperative orthopaedic patients in the community.
INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to investigate how patients, general practitioners (GPs) and orthopaedic trainees, feel about the proposed governmental changes to reduce orthopaedic out-patient clinics by having GPs and specialist nurses follow-up postoperative orthopaedic patients in the community. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The design was a cross-sectional questionnaire study including a teaching hospital and general practitioners in the Norfolk primary care trust. Participants were 73 orthopaedic postoperative patients who attended out-patients over a 1-week period in July 2007 who all responded. Of 250 GPs, 239 responded. Of 38 orthopaedic trainees at the level of senior house officer (post MRCS) and specialist registrar (Eastern Deanery Rotation and Pott Rotation), 30 responded RESULTS: Of the 73 patients, 56 (77%) felt the surgeon was best suited to manage them postoperatively. Of these, 47 felt that it was very important that the surgical team saw them postoperatively. Also, 53 felt that their GP did not have sufficient knowledge and experience to deal with their current orthopaedic problem adequately. Only 12 GPs of 239 (5%) felt very confident assessing postoperative patients. Inadequate resources available to diagnose and treat postoperative complications was noted by 74% as the reason for not performing follow-up in primary care, and only 18% felt they should follow-up postoperative patients. All trainees felt that following up their own postoperative patients was important to their training. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients, GPs, and orthopaedic trainees had serious doubts about the proposed governmental changes to reduce orthopaedic out-patient clinics by having GPs and specialist nurses follow-up postoperative orthopaedic patients in the community.
Authors: Jennifer Muschol; Martin Heinrich; Christian Heiss; Gero Knapp; Holger Repp; Henning Schneider; Ulrich Thormann; Johanna Uhlar; Kai Unzeitig; Christian Gissel Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-07-27 Impact factor: 7.076