Karen Lorimer1, Margaret E Reid, Graham J Hart. 1. MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, 4 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow G12 8RZ, UK. karen@sphsu.mrc.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the willingness of young men and women to be tested for Chlamydia trachomatis in three non-medical settings. METHODS: Men and women aged between 16 and 24 years were invited to complete a self-administered questionnaire and provide a urine sample in non-medical settings: 'education' (one further education college), 'health and fitness' (three local authority leisure centres) and 'workplace' (two call centres). RESULTS: Eighty-four percent of age-eligible users approached in the settings agreed to complete a questionnaire (n = 363). Among the sexually active people (n = 346), the uptake of screening varied by setting [education 19.1% (22/115), health and fitness 48.8% (62/127), workplace 27.8% (29/104); p<0.001]. Health and fitness settings (OR 4.08; 95% CI 2.04-8.14) and perception of being at risk of having chlamydia (OR 2.47; 95% CI 1.33-4.58) were strong predictors of providing a urine sample. Adjusting for setting and age group (<20 years vs 20+ years), women were less likely than men to provide a urine sample (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.26-0.70). All five positive cases (4.4%; 4.9% in men, 3.8% in women) were contacted with their results by a health adviser and invited to be treated at a local genitourinary medicine clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Men were more willing than women to be tested for C. trachomatis in these non-medical settings, but uptake varied by setting. Thus, increasing opportunities for the take-up of testing in particular non-medical settings might be a more effective approach to including young men who are not reached by clinic control efforts.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the willingness of young men and women to be tested for Chlamydia trachomatis in three non-medical settings. METHODS:Men and women aged between 16 and 24 years were invited to complete a self-administered questionnaire and provide a urine sample in non-medical settings: 'education' (one further education college), 'health and fitness' (three local authority leisure centres) and 'workplace' (two call centres). RESULTS: Eighty-four percent of age-eligible users approached in the settings agreed to complete a questionnaire (n = 363). Among the sexually active people (n = 346), the uptake of screening varied by setting [education 19.1% (22/115), health and fitness 48.8% (62/127), workplace 27.8% (29/104); p<0.001]. Health and fitness settings (OR 4.08; 95% CI 2.04-8.14) and perception of being at risk of having chlamydia (OR 2.47; 95% CI 1.33-4.58) were strong predictors of providing a urine sample. Adjusting for setting and age group (<20 years vs 20+ years), women were less likely than men to provide a urine sample (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.26-0.70). All five positive cases (4.4%; 4.9% in men, 3.8% in women) were contacted with their results by a health adviser and invited to be treated at a local genitourinary medicine clinic. CONCLUSIONS:Men were more willing than women to be tested for C. trachomatis in these non-medical settings, but uptake varied by setting. Thus, increasing opportunities for the take-up of testing in particular non-medical settings might be a more effective approach to including young men who are not reached by clinic control efforts.
Authors: John M Saunders; Catherine H Mercer; Lorna J Sutcliffe; Graham J Hart; Jackie Cassell; Claudia S Estcourt Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2012-04-17 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Sebastian S Fuller; Catherine H Mercer; Andrew J Copas; John Saunders; Lorna J Sutcliffe; Jackie A Cassell; Graham Hart; Anne M Johnson; Tracy E Roberts; Louise J Jackson; Pamela Muniina; Claudia S Estcourt Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2014-12-15 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Catherine H Mercer; Sebastian S Fuller; John M Saunders; Pamela Muniina; Andrew J Copas; Graham J Hart; Lorna J Sutcliffe; Anne M Johnson; Jackie A Cassell; Claudia S Estcourt Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Geneviève A F S van Liere; Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers; Jan E A M van Bergen; Hannelore M Götz; Frans Stals; Christian J P A Hoebe Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2014-11-18 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: D Z Kounali; N J Welton; K Soldan; S C Woodhall; J Kevin Dunbar; S J Migchelsen; C H Mercer; P Horner; A E Ades Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 2.451
Authors: Belinda Hengel; Muhammad S Jamil; Jacqueline K Mein; Lisa Maher; John M Kaldor; Rebecca J Guy Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-11-04 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Sarah Kerry-Barnard; Susie Huntington; Charlotte Fleming; Fiona Reid; S Tariq Sadiq; Vari M Drennan; Elisabeth Adams; Pippa Oakeshott Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 2.655