Literature DB >> 19126136

Driving standards in tracheostomy care: a preliminary communication of the St Mary's ENT-led multi disciplinary team approach.

A Arora1, R Hettige, S Ifeacho, A Narula.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess tracheostomy care and improve standards following the introduction of an ENT-led multidisciplinary tracheostomy ward round service.
DESIGN: Prospective third cycle audit.
SETTING: Tertiary academic London hospital serving an inner city population of multi-ethnic background (St Mary's Hospital, Paddington, London). PARTICIPANTS: Patients with a tracheostomy discharged from ITU to general wards. IMPLEMENTED ACTIONS: Establishment of an ENT-led Tracheostomy Multidisciplinary Team (TMDT). Weekly TMDT ward round to manage patients with a tracheostomy. ENT-led educational and training sessions for allied healthcare professionals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Compliance with local tracheostomy care guidelines (St Mary's tracheostomy care bundle) and time to tracheostomy tube decannulation.
RESULTS: Preliminary results of 10 patients show improved compliance with tracheostomy care guidelines, established in 2004, rising to 94%. Average time to decannulation was significantly reduced from 21 to 5 days (P-value = 0.0005, Mann Whitney Wilcoxon Test). The mean total tracheostomy time was reduced from 34 to 24 days although this was not statistically significant (P-value = 0.13, Mann Whitney Wilcoxon Test).
CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of regular ENT-led multidisciplinary input for patients with a tracheostomy significantly improved compliance with nursing care standards. There was also a reduction in the total length of time tracheostomy tubes remain in situ, with time to decannulation significantly reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19126136     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01814.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1749-4478            Impact factor:   2.597


  7 in total

1.  High Rate of Medical Emergency Team Activation in Children with Tracheostomy.

Authors:  Brianna L McKelvie; Anna-Theresa Lobos; Jason Chan; Franco Momoli; James Dayre McNally
Journal:  J Pediatr Intensive Care       Date:  2019-09-02

2.  Rectal catheter as tracheostomy tube introducer.

Authors:  Jaiganesh Manickavasagam; Baskaran Ranganathan; Janet Ryles; Jeanette McConachie
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Tracheotomy care simulation training program for inpatient providers.

Authors:  Ryan Alyson-Yao Tiu; Tanya Kim Meyer; Ross M Mayerhoff; Joel C Ray; Patricia A Kritek; Albert Lincoln Merati; Maya Guirish Sardesai
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-09-05

4.  Tracheostomy patients on the ward: multiple benefits from a multidisciplinary team?

Authors:  Mihae Yu
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 5.  Multidisciplinary care for tracheostomy patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marie Garrubba; Tari Turner; Clare Grieveson
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Microbiological evaluation of different reprocessing methods for cuffed and un-cuffed tracheostomy tubes in home-care and hospital setting.

Authors:  Matthias Leonhard; Ojan Assadian; Michaela Zumtobel; Berit Schneider-Stickler
Journal:  GMS Hyg Infect Control       Date:  2016-02-16

7.  Use of Tracheostomy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: American College of Chest Physicians/American Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology/Association of Interventional Pulmonology Program Directors Expert Panel Report.

Authors:  Carla R Lamb; Neeraj R Desai; Luis Angel; Udit Chaddha; Ashutosh Sachdeva; Sonali Sethi; Hassan Bencheqroun; Hiren Mehta; Jason Akulian; A Christine Argento; Javier Diaz-Mendoza; Ali Musani; Septimiu Murgu
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 10.262

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.