Literature DB >> 19125778

Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor alogliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by glyburide monotherapy.

R E Pratley1, M S Kipnes, P R Fleck, C Wilson, Q Mekki.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of alogliptin, a potent and highly selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, in combination with glyburide in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by sulphonylurea monotherapy.
METHODS: After a 2-week screening period, adult patients 18-80 years of age entered a 4-week run-in/stabilization period in which they were switched from their own sulphonylurea medication to an equivalent dose of glyburide (open label) plus placebo (single blind). After the run-in period, patients were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with alogliptin 12.5 mg (n = 203), alogliptin 25 mg (n = 198), or placebo (n = 99) for 26 weeks. The primary end-point was change from baseline to week 26 in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c). Secondary end-points included clinical response rates and changes in fasting plasma glucose, beta-cell function (fasting proinsulin, insulin, proinsulin/insulin ratio, and C-peptide, and homeostasis model assessment beta-cell function), body weight, and safety end-points [adverse events (AEs), clinical laboratory tests, vital signs and electrocardiographic readings].
RESULTS: The study population had a mean age of 57 years and a mean disease duration of 8 years; it was well balanced for gender (52% women) and was mainly white (71%). The mean baseline HbA1c was approximately 8.1% in each group. Significantly greater least squares (LS) mean reductions in HbA1c were seen at week 26 with alogliptin 12.5 mg (-0.38%) and 25 mg (-0.52%) vs. placebo (+0.01%; p < 0.001), and more patients in the alogliptin 25-mg group had HbA1c levels < or =7.0% at week 26 (34.8%, p = 0.002) vs. placebo (18.2%). Proportionately more patients in the alogliptin 12.5 mg (47.3%) and 25 mg (50.5%) groups had an HbA1c reduction > or =0.5% from baseline compared with patients in the placebo group (26.3%; p < 0.001). Minor improvements in individual markers of beta-cell function were seen with alogliptin, but no significant treatment group differences were noted relative to placebo. Minor LS mean changes in body weight were noted across groups (placebo, -0.20 kg; alogliptin 12.5 mg, +0.60 kg; alogliptin 25 mg, +0.68 kg). AEs were reported for 63-64% of patients receiving alogliptin and 54% of patients receiving placebo. Few AEs were treatment limiting (2.0-2.5% across groups), and serious AEs (2.0-5.6%) were infrequent, similar across groups, and generally considered not related to treatment. The incidences of hypoglycaemia for placebo, alogliptin 12.5 mg and alogliptin 25 mg groups were 11.1, 15.8 and 9.6% respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by glyburide monotherapy, the addition of alogliptin resulted in clinically significant reductions in HbA1c without increased incidence of hypoglycaemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19125778     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.01016.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab        ISSN: 1462-8902            Impact factor:   6.577


  48 in total

Review 1.  [Update on the latest family of oral drugs marketed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: DPP-4 inhibitors. Contributions with respect to other families of oral antidiabetic agents].

Authors:  Fernando Alvarez Guisasola
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.137

Review 2.  Pharmacology of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: similarities and differences.

Authors:  Roberta Baetta; Alberto Corsini
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Investigational anti-hyperglycemic agents: the future of type 2 diabetes therapy?

Authors:  Sachin K Majumdar; Silvio E Inzucchi
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  Alogliptin.

Authors:  Dennis J Cada; Terri L Levien; Danial E Baker
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2013-07

5.  Alogliptin (nesina) for adults with type-2 diabetes.

Authors:  Laura Dineen; Connie Law; Rebecca Scher; Eunice Pyon
Journal:  P T       Date:  2014-03

Review 6.  Alogliptin: a review of its use in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Update on the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Juan José Marín-Peñalver; Iciar Martín-Timón; Cristina Sevillano-Collantes; Francisco Javier Del Cañizo-Gómez
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2016-09-15

Review 8.  The place of GLP-1-based therapy in diabetes management: differences between DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists.

Authors:  Dara L Eckerle Mize; Marzieh Salehi
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 9.  Differences in the glucose-lowering efficacy of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors between Asians and non-Asians: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Y G Kim; S Hahn; T J Oh; S H Kwak; K S Park; Y M Cho
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 10.122

10.  Incretin-based therapies: new treatments for type 2 diabetes in the new millennium.

Authors:  Joan Khoo; Christopher K Rayner; Karen L Jones; Michael Horowitz
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.