Literature DB >> 19125768

An assessment of the accuracy and usability of a novel optical wound measurement system.

F L Bowling1, L King, H Fadavi, J A Paterson, K Preece, R W Daniel, D J Matthews, A J M Boulton.   

Abstract

AIMS: Measurement of wound size can predict healing and provide information to guide treatment. This study assesses a novel optical wound imaging system that creates a three-dimensional image of the ulcer.
METHODS: Using a new camera-based digital system and traditional elliptical wound measurements, 36 foot ulcers from 31 patients (aged 44-94 years, median 70 years) were examined during a 12-week period at two centres. Median diabetes duration was 18 years (range 6-56 years). Seventeen percent had Type 1 diabetes, 93% had peripheral neuropathy and 57% had peripheral artery disease. Twenty-five were reviewed consecutively, resulting in 76 ulcer examinations. Median ulcer size was 94 mm(2), with size ranging from 3.1 to 2195 mm(2).
RESULTS: Pearson, Spearman and Kendall rank coefficients showed a strong correlation (in all cases P < 0.001) between digital measurements of wounds against traditional hand-measured estimates. Intra-observer variation of wound length using digital elliptical measurement (DEM) gave a coefficient of variation of < 3.0%. Interobserver variation of wound length using DEM was < 6.5%. Variation from a standard known-size wound area was < 8.0% across 30 trials.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a strong correlation between digital and traditional measurement techniques. The system can be easily deployed in routine clinical practice, providing an objective visual record, allowing remote in-depth analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19125768     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02611.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  12 in total

1.  Discrimination of basal cell carcinoma from benign lesions based on extraction of ulcer features in polarized-light dermoscopy images.

Authors:  Serkan Kefel; Pelin Guvenc; Robert LeAnder; Sherea M Stricklin; William V Stoecker
Journal:  Skin Res Technol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 2.  Methods to assess area and volume of wounds - a systematic review.

Authors:  Line Bisgaard Jørgensen; Jens A Sørensen; Gregor Be Jemec; Knud B Yderstraede
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Noninvasive and high-resolution optical monitoring of healing of diabetic dermal excisional wounds implanted with biodegradable in situ gelable hydrogels.

Authors:  Zhijia Yuan; Julia Zakhaleva; Hugang Ren; Jingxuan Liu; Weiliam Chen; Yingtian Pan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 4.  Applying 21st century imaging technology to wound healing: an Avant-Gardist approach.

Authors:  Frank Lee Bowling; James Paterson; Agbor Ndip
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-01

Review 5.  Critical Review of Noninvasive Optical Technologies for Wound Imaging.

Authors:  Maanasa Jayachandran; Suset Rodriguez; Elizabeth Solis; Jiali Lei; Anuradha Godavarty
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Reliability of a Three-Dimensional Wound Camera and Correlation With Routine Ruler Measurement in Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration.

Authors:  Joel Willem Johan Lasschuit; Jill Featherston; Katherine Thuy Trang Tonks
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-11-26

7.  A cost-effective transparency-based digital imaging for efficient and accurate wound area measurement.

Authors:  Pei-Nan Li; Hong Li; Mo-Li Wu; Shou-Yu Wang; Qing-You Kong; Zhen Zhang; Yuan Sun; Jia Liu; De-Cheng Lv
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Angiogenesis is induced and wound size is reduced by electrical stimulation in an acute wound healing model in human skin.

Authors:  Sara Ud-Din; Anil Sebastian; Pamela Giddings; James Colthurst; Sigrid Whiteside; Julie Morris; Richard Nuccitelli; Christine Pullar; Mo Baguneid; Ardeshir Bayat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Quantitative Methods for Measuring Repair Rates and Innate-Immune Cell Responses in Wounded Mouse Skin.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Elizabeth Gothard; Mark C Coles; Carrie A Ambler
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 10.  A systematic review of objective burn scar measurements.

Authors:  Kwang Chear Lee; Janine Dretzke; Liam Grover; Ann Logan; Naiem Moiemen
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2016-04-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.