| Literature DB >> 19125180 |
Panayoula C Tsiotra1, Constantine Tsigos, Eleni Anastasiou, Eleni Yfanti, Eleni Boutati, Emmanouil Souvatzoglou, Ioannis Kyrou, Sotirios A Raptis.
Abstract
Resistin has been shown to cause insulin resistance and to impair glucose tolerance in rodents, but in humans its physiological role still remains elusive. The aim of this study was to examine whether resistin mRNA expression in human peripheral mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and its corresponding plasma levels are altered in type 2 diabetes. Resistin mRNA levels were easily detectable in human PBMC, and found to be higher in DM2 compared to healthy women (P = .05). Similarly, mononuclear mRNA levels of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1beta, TNF-alpha, and IL-6 were all significantly higher in DM2 compared to control women (P < .001). The corresponding plasma resistin levels were slightly, but not significantly, increased in DM2 women (P = .051), and overall, they correlated significantly with BMI (r = 0.406, P = .010) and waist circumference (r = 0.516, P = .003), but not with fasting insulin levels or HOMA-IR. Resistin mRNA expression is increased in PBMC from DM2 women, together with increased expression of the inflammatory cytokines IL-1beta, TNF-alpha, and IL-6, independent of obesity. These results suggest that resistin and cytokines might contribute to the low-grade inflammation and the increased atherogenic risk observed in these patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 19125180 PMCID: PMC2606019 DOI: 10.1155/2008/892864
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mediators Inflamm ISSN: 0962-9351 Impact factor: 4.711
Patients' characteristics, their fasting glucose, fasting insulin, triglycerides, HDL and FFA levels, the HOMA-IR and Matsuda indices.
|
| BMI (Kg/m2) | Waist (cm) | Fasting glucose (mg/dL) | Fasting insulin ( | HOMA-IR | Matsuda | Triglycerides (mg/dL) | HDL (mg/dL) | FFA (mmol/L) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NGT | BMI < 27 | 14 | 22.5 ± 0.7 | 76.5 ± 2.3 | 87.5 ± 3.6 | 6.4 ± 0.6 | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 9.3 ± 0.9 | 63.2 ± 5.0 | 46.5 ± 3.4 | 0.43 ± 0.05 |
| BMI > 27 | 12 | 32.9 ± 1.5* | 95.7 ± 3.0* | 98.3 ± 2.1* | 12.7 ± 2.1* | 3.0 ± 0.5* | 5.0 ± 1.3* | 100.2 ± 18.9 | 44.0 ± 3.3 | 0.47 ± 0.05 | |
|
| |||||||||||
| DM2 | BMI < 27 | 8 | 23.7 ± 0.7§ | 78.2 ± 3.4§ | 156.9 ± 32.9*§ | 8.3 ± 1.9 | 4.2 ± 2.1 | 6.3 ± 1.4 | 80.3 ± 17.4 | 39.0 ± 2.9 | 0.55 ± 0.10 |
| BMI > 27 | 14 | 36.4 ± 1.4* | 108.1 ± 3.0*§ | 136.7 ± 13.0*§ | 16.6 ± 2.6* | 5.6 ± 1.0* | 2.4 ± 0.3*§ | 150.8 ± 26.5* | 27.4 ± 1.5*§ | 0.59 ± 0.04* | |
Mean ± SEM: *P < .03 versus NGT-BMI < 27; § P < .05 versus NGT-BMI > 27.
| 5′-sense primer-3′ | 5′-a-sense primer-3′ | |
|---|---|---|
| Resistin | GGGCTGTTGGTGTCTAGCAAG | GTCTCGGCGCGCACAT |
| IL-1 | CAGGGACAGGATATGGAGCAA | GCAGACTCAAATTCCAGCTTGTTA |
| TNF- | ACAAGCCTGTAGCCATGTT | AAAGTAGACCTGCCCAGACT |
| IL-6 | CCAATCTGGATTCAATGAGGAGACT | GAGCCCTCAGGCTGGACTG |
|
| CTTCTACAATGAGCTGCGTGTG | GTGAGGATCTTCATGAGGTAGTCAGTC |
| PBGD | GGCTGCAACGGCGGAA | CCTGTGGTGGACATAGCAATGATT |
|
| ||
| 5′-FL probe-3′ | 5′-LC Red640/LCRed705 probe-3′ | |
|
| ||
| Resistin | GCGACCTCCTGGATCCTCTCATTGA | GCTTCTTCCATGGAGCACAGGGTC |
| IL-1 | GCTTATCATCTTTCAACACGCAGGACA | GTACAGATTCTTTTCCTTGAGGCCCA |
| TNF- | GCATTGGCCCGGCGGTTC | CCACTGGAGCTGCCCCTCAGCT |
| IL-6 | AGATGCAATAACCACCCCTGACCCAA | CACAAATGCCAGCCTGCTGACGAA |
|
| GGTATGCCCTCCCCCATGCC | TCCTGCGTCTGGACCTGGCTG |
| PBGD | CATACAGACGGACAGTGTGGTGGCAAC | TGAAAGCCTCGTACCCTGGCCTG |
Figure 1(a) Bar graphs compare relative resistin/β-actin mRNA levels, (b) TNF-α/β-actin mRNA levels, (c) IL-6/PBGD mRNA levels, and (d) IL-1β/β-actin mRNA levels, from peripheral mononuclear-enriched monocytes from NGT-control and DM2 women. *P < .05 versus NGT-women.
Relative resistin, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β mRNA levels from mononuclear cells between the subgroups of the NGT- and the DM2- women.
| Resistin/ | TNF- | IL-6/PBGD | IL-1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NGT | BMI < 27 | 0.50 ± 0.14 | 0.03 ± 0.008 | 20.1 ± 16.1 | 5.4 ± 1.7 |
| BMI > 27 | 0.54 ± 0.26 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 23.5 ± 20.7 | 23.1 ± 17.6 | |
|
| |||||
| DM2 | BMI < 27 | 0.70 ± 0.25 | 0.31 ± 0.16*§ | 242.0 ± 120.5*§ | 79.9 ± 44.0 |
| BMI > 27 | 0.48 ± 0.07 | 0.37 ± 0.16*§ | 405.1 ± 194.9*§ | 169.1 ± 55.1*§ | |
Data expressed as mean ± SE: *P < .017 versus NGT-(BMI < 27)-women; § P < .013 versus NGT-(BMI > 27)-women.
Figure 2Comparison of circulating resistin, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β protein levels between the NGT-healthy control and DM2 women. *P < .051 versus NGT-women.
Circulating resistin, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β protein levels between the subgroups of the NGT- and the DM2-women.
| Resistin (ng/mL) | TNF- | IL-6 (pg/mL) | IL-1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NGT | BMI < 27 | 2.65 ± 0.19 | 2.07 ± 0.19 | 0.80 ± 0.14 | 1.37 ± 0.39 |
| BMI > 27 | 2.98 ± 0.23 | 2.32 ± 0.20 | 1.77 ± 0.36* | 0.97 ± 0.52 | |
|
| |||||
| DM2 | BMI < 27 | 3.24 ± 0.45 | 2.14 ± 0.45 | 0.93 ± 0.18§ | 1.19 ± 0.85 |
| BMI > 27 | 3.36 ± 0.29 | 3.24 ± 0.36* | 1.84 ± 0.28* | 0.79 ± 0.42 | |
Data expressed as mean ± SE: *P < .015 versus NGT-(BMI < 27)-women; § P < .05 versus NGT-(BMI > 27)-women.