Literature DB >> 19124448

120-day comparative analysis of adhesion grade and quantity, mesh contraction, and tissue response to a novel omega-3 fatty acid bioabsorbable barrier macroporous mesh after intraperitoneal placement.

Richard A Pierce1, Juan M Perrone, Abdelrahman Nimeri, Jennifer A Sexton, Julie Walcutt, Margaret M Frisella, Brent D Matthews.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate adhesion formation, mesh contraction, and tissue response to an omega-3 fatty acid barrier-coated lightweight polypropylene mesh (C-Qur) after intra-abdominal placement, and compare these properties to those of other commercially available meshes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: After randomization, 3 x 3 cm pieces of Atrium C-Qur, Mesh ProLite Ultra, Composix, Parietex, Proceed, Sepramesh, and DualMesh were sewn to the intact peritoneum on either side of a midline incision in 41 New Zealand white rabbits. Necropsy was performed at 120 days, and explants were evaluated for adhesion grade, adhesion amount, and mesh contraction. Histologic evaluation included extent of capsule formation, abdominal wall tissue ingrowth, degrees of inflammation and vascularization of the surrounding tissue, and the presence of mesothelialization. Results. There were no significant differences between the C-Qur mesh and the commercially available meshes tested with regard to adhesion grade or amount, although percentage adhesion coverage for the C-Qur mesh was much less than for Composix and Proceed. The C-Qur mesh contracted less than all meshes, significantly less (P < .05) than DualMesh or Proceed. DualMesh exhibited the greatest amount of capsule formation and inflammation on its parietal side as compared with the other meshes.
CONCLUSIONS: Placing lightweight polypropylene mesh with an omega-3 fatty acid barrier coating intraperitoneally results in more favorable adhesion characteristics compared with Composix and Proceed meshes at 120-day explantation after intraperitoneal placement. The minimal amount of contraction and favorable tissue response in comparison to other commercially available meshes makes C-Qur mesh a practical alternative for laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19124448     DOI: 10.1177/1553350608330479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Innov        ISSN: 1553-3506            Impact factor:   2.058


  20 in total

1.  Physicomechanical evaluation of absorbable and nonabsorbable barrier composite meshes for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Corey R Deeken; Michael S Abdo; Margaret M Frisella; Brent D Matthews
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  A review of the composition, characteristics, and effectiveness of barrier mesh prostheses utilized for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Corey R Deeken; Keith M Faucher; Brent D Matthews
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Efficacy of robotic versus open transversus abdominis release in a porcine model.

Authors:  W H Tan; J M McAllister; J A Blatnik
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-10-28       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Bioprosthetic mesh in abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Donald P Baumann; Charles E Butler
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  Prospective evaluation of adhesion characteristics to intraperitoneal mesh and adhesiolysis-related complications during laparoscopic re-exploration after prior ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Eric D Jenkins; Victoria Yom; Lora Melman; L Michael Brunt; J Christopher Eagon; Margaret M Frisella; Brent D Matthews
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Predicting in vivo responses to biomaterials via combined in vitro and in silico analysis.

Authors:  Matthew T Wolf; Yoram Vodovotz; Stephen Tottey; Bryan N Brown; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 3.056

7.  Modifying hernia mesh design to improve device mechanical performance and promote tension-free repair.

Authors:  Mohamed M Ibrahim; Luke P Poveromo; Richard R Glisson; Agustin Cornejo; Alfredo E Farjat; Ken Gall; Howard Levinson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Silk fibroin hydrogel as physical barrier for prevention of post hernia adhesion.

Authors:  S Konar; R Guha; B Kundu; S Nandi; T K Ghosh; S C Kundu; A Konar; S Hazra
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Adhesion prevention in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study comparing three lightweight porous meshes recommended for intraperitoneal use.

Authors:  L D'Amore; F Ceci; S Mattia; M Fabbi; P Negro; F Gossetti
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 10.  Naturally derived and synthetic scaffolds for skeletal muscle reconstruction.

Authors:  Matthew T Wolf; Christopher L Dearth; Sonya B Sonnenberg; Elizabeth G Loboa; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 15.470

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.