Literature DB >> 19123906

Gamma Knife surgery used as primary and repeated treatment for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia.

Chuan-Fu Huang1, Hsien-Tang Tu, Wen-Shan Liu, Shyh-Ying Chiou, Long-Yau Lin.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The purpose of this study was to assess the outcome of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia (TN) treated with Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) as a primary and repeated treatment modality with a mean follow-up of 5.7 years.
METHODS: Between July 1999 and September 2005, a total of 89 patients with idiopathic TN underwent GKS as a primary treatment. The entry zone of the TN was targeted with a 4-mm collimator and treated with a maximal dose of 60-90 Gy (mean 79 Gy). The dose to the pontine margin was always kept < 15 Gy. Twenty patients received repeated GKS for recurrent or residual pain with a maximal dose of 40-76 Gy (mean 52 Gy). For the second procedure, the target was positioned at the same location as the first treatment.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 68 months (range 32-104 months). Sixty-nine (77.5%) of the 89 patients experienced a favorable response, as follows: 50 (56%) had excellent, 12 (13.5%) had good, and 7 (7.8%) had fair outcomes. The mean time to pain relief was 1.1 months (range 2 days-6 months). No significant correlation, but more likely a tendency, was found between the dose and pain relief (p = 0.08). Also, no correlation was noted for facial numbness (p = 0.77). The mean follow-up period after repeated GKS was 60 months (range 32-87 months). Outcomes after repeated GKS were excellent in 11 patients (55%) and good in 1 (5%). Seven patients experienced facial numbness. No correlation was found between the additive dose and pain relief (p = 0.24) or facial numbness (p = 0.15). Final outcomes of primary and repeated GKS were excellent in 61 (68.5%), good in 13 (14.6%), and fair in 7 (7.9%). In total, 91% of the patients were successfully treated with this method. There was no statistical significance for efficacy between primary and repeated GKS (p = 0.65), but there was a significant difference for facial numbness (p = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: Gamma Knife surgery established durable pain relief when used as a primary and repeated surgery. Treatment was successful for a total of 91% of patients at a mean follow-up of 5.7 years, but facial numbness was also relatively higher.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19123906     DOI: 10.3171/JNS/2008/109/12/S27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  5 in total

1.  Stereotactic radiosurgery of essential trigeminal neuralgia using Leksell Gamma Knife model C with automatic positioning system: technical nuances and evaluation of outcome in 130 patients with at least 2 years follow-up after treatment.

Authors:  Motohiro Hayashi; Mikhail Chernov; Noriko Tamura; Takaomi Taira; Masahiro Izawa; Shoji Yomo; Mariko Nagai; Cheng-Siu Chang; Pavel Ivanov; Manabu Tamura; Yoshihiro Muragaki; Yoshikazu Okada; Hiroshi Iseki; Kintomo Takakura
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Feasibility of multiple repeat gamma knife radiosurgeries for trigeminal neuralgia: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Guy C Jones; Ameer L Elaimy; John J Demakas; Hansi Jiang; Wayne T Lamoreaux; Robert K Fairbanks; Alexander R Mackay; Barton S Cooke; Christopher M Lee
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2011-09-04

3.  Clinical outcomes of gamma knife radiosurgery in the treatment of patients with trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  Ameer L Elaimy; Peter W Hanson; Wayne T Lamoreaux; Alexander R Mackay; John J Demakas; Robert K Fairbanks; Barton S Cooke; Sudheer R Thumma; Christopher M Lee
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-25

4.  Microvascular Decompression Versus Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Decision Analysis.

Authors:  Ian Berger; Nikhil Nayak; James Schuster; John Lee; Sherman Stein; Neil R Malhotra
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-01-26

Review 5.  Treatment Outcomes in Trigeminal Neuralgia-A Systematic Review of Domains, Dimensions and Measures.

Authors:  Carolina Venda Nova; Joanna M Zakrzewska; Sarah R Baker; Richeal Ni Riordain
Journal:  World Neurosurg X       Date:  2020-01-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.