Literature DB >> 19123887

Definition of the key target volume in radiosurgical management of arteriovenous malformations: a new dynamic concept based on angiographic circulation time.

Ramiro Del Valle1, Marco Zenteno, José Jaramillo, Angel Lee, Salvador De Anda.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The cumulative experience worldwide indicates complete radiosurgical obliteration rates of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) ranging from 35 to 90%. The purpose of this study was to propose a strategy to increase the obliteration rate for AVMs through the dynamic definition of the key target volume (KTV).
METHODS: A prospective series of patients harboring an AVM was assessed using digital subtraction angiography in which a digital counter was used to measure the several stages of the frame-by-frame circulation time. All the patients were analyzed using dynamic measurement planning to define the KTV, corresponding to the volume of the shunt with the least vascular resistance and the earliest venous drainage. All patients underwent catheter-based angiography, a subgroup was additionally assessed by means of a superselective catheterization, and among these a further subgroup received embolization. The shunts were also categorized according to their angioarchitectural type: fistulous, plexiform, or mixed. The authors applied the radiosurgery-based grading system (RBGS) as well to find a correlation with the obliteration rate.
RESULTS: This series includes 44 patients treated by radiosurgery; global angiography was performed for all patients, including dynamic measurement planning. Eighty-four percent of them underwent superselective catheterization, and 50% of the total population underwent embolization. In the embolized arm of the study, the pretreatment volume was up to 120 ml. In patients with a single treatment, the mean volume was 8.5 ml, and the median volume was 6.95 +/- 4.56 ml (mean +/- standard deviation), with a KTV of up to 15 ml. For prospectively staged radiosurgery, the mean KTV was 28 ml. The marginal radiation dose was 18-22 Gy, with a mean of dose 20 Gy. The mean RBGS score was 1.70. The overall obliteration rate was 91%, including the repeated radiosurgery group (4 patients), in which 100% showed complete obliteration. The overall permanent deficit was 2 of 44 patients, 1 in each group.
CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic definition of the KTV might increase the obliteration rate, even in complex AVMs, allowing the treatment of smaller volumes off the recruitment vessels (pseudonidus). By using this technique, the authors avoided double-blind treatment, where the neurosurgeon does not know precisely which type of lesion he or she is irradiating and the interventionalist does not know why and what he or she is embolizing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19123887     DOI: 10.3171/JNS/2008/109/12/S8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  7 in total

1.  Liquid embolization material reduces the delivered radiation dose: clinical myth or reality?

Authors:  F Bing; R Doucet; F Lacroix; J P Bahary; T Darsaut; D Roy; F Guilbert; J Raymond; A Weill
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  The predictors of clinical outcomes in brainstem arteriovenous malformations after stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Xiaolin Ai; Jianguo Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Stereotactic radiosurgery with versus without prior Onyx embolization for brain arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Ching-Jen Chen; Dale Ding; Cheng-Chia Lee; Kathryn N Kearns; I Jonathan Pomeraniec; Christopher P Cifarelli; David E Arsanious; Roman Liscak; Jaromir Hanuska; Brian J Williams; Mehran B Yusuf; Shiao Y Woo; Natasha Ironside; Rebecca M Burke; Ronald E Warnick; Daniel M Trifiletti; David Mathieu; Monica Mureb; Carolina Benjamin; Douglas Kondziolka; Caleb E Feliciano; Rafael Rodriguez-Mercado; Kevin M Cockroft; Scott Simon; Heath B Mackley; Samer G Zammar; Neel T Patel; Varun Padmanaban; Nathan Beatson; Anissa Saylany; John Y K Lee; Jason P Sheehan
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 5.408

4.  A proposed classification for assessing rupture risk in patients with intracranial arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Felipe Padilla-Vazquez; Marco A Zenteno; Jorge Balderrama; Victor Hugo Escobar-de la Garma; Daniel San Juan; Carlos Trenado
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-12-27

5.  Efficacy and Safety of Combined Endovascular Embolization and Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Patients with Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zhiqun Jiang; Xuezhi Zhang; Xichen Wan; Minjun Wei; Yue Liu; Cong Ding; Yilv Wan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Multimodal angiographic assessment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a pilot study.

Authors:  Raphaël Blanc; Aude Seiler; Thomas Robert; Humain Baharvahdat; Maxime Lafarge; Julien Savatovsky; Jérôme Hodel; Gabriele Ciccio; Dorian Chauvet; Silvia Pistocchi; Bruno Bartolini; Hocine Redjem; Michel Piotin
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 5.836

7.  3D-Printing of Arteriovenous Malformations for Radiosurgical Treatment: Pushing Anatomy Understanding to Real Boundaries.

Authors:  Alfredo Conti; Antonio Pontoriero; Giuseppe Iatì; Daniele Marino; Domenico La Torre; Sergio Vinci; Antonino Germanò; Stefano Pergolizzi; Francesco Tomasello
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-04-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.