Literature DB >> 19123058

Review and implementation of cure models based on first hitting times for Wiener processes.

Jeremy Balka1, Anthony F Desmond, Paul D McNicholas.   

Abstract

The development of models and methods for cure rate estimation has recently burgeoned into an important subfield of survival analysis. Much of the literature focuses on the standard mixture model. Recently, process-based models have been suggested. We focus on several models based on first passage times for Wiener processes. Whitmore and others have studied these models in a variety of contexts. Lee and Whitmore (Stat Sci 21(4):501-513, 2006) give a comprehensive review of a variety of first hitting time models and briefly discuss their potential as cure rate models. In this paper, we study the Wiener process with negative drift as a possible cure rate model but the resulting defective inverse Gaussian model is found to provide a poor fit in some cases. Several possible modifications are then suggested, which improve the defective inverse Gaussian. These modifications include: the inverse Gaussian cure rate mixture model; a mixture of two inverse Gaussian models; incorporation of heterogeneity in the drift parameter; and the addition of a second absorbing barrier to the Wiener process, representing an immunity threshold. This class of process-based models is a useful alternative to the standard model and provides an improved fit compared to the standard model when applied to many of the datasets that we have studied. Implementation of this class of models is facilitated using expectation-maximization (EM) algorithms and variants thereof, including the gradient EM algorithm. Parameter estimates for each of these EM algorithms are given and the proposed models are applied to both real and simulated data, where they perform well.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19123058     DOI: 10.1007/s10985-008-9108-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal        ISSN: 1380-7870            Impact factor:   1.588


  13 in total

1.  A nonparametric mixture model for cure rate estimation.

Authors:  Y Peng; K B Dear
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Estimation in a Cox proportional hazards cure model.

Authors:  J P Sy; J M Taylor
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The estimation of the proportion of patients cured after treatment for cancer of the breast.

Authors:  J L HAYBITTLE
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1959-11       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Parametric versus non-parametric methods for estimating cure rates based on censored survival data.

Authors:  A B Cantor; J J Shuster
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Semi-parametric estimation in failure time mixture models.

Authors:  J M Taylor
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Failure inference from a marker process based on a bivariate Wiener model.

Authors:  G A Whitmore; M J Crowder; J F Lawless
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Modelling cure rates using the Gompertz model with covariate information.

Authors:  P W Gieser; M N Chang; P V Rao; J J Shuster; J Pullen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Effects of frailty in survival analysis.

Authors:  O O Aalen
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  The use of mixture models for the analysis of survival data with long-term survivors.

Authors:  V T Farewell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Evaluation of protocol change in burn-care management using the Cox proportional hazards model with time-dependent covariates.

Authors:  J M Ichida; J T Wassell; M D Keller; L W Ayers
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  7 in total

1.  Proportional hazards and threshold regression: their theoretical and practical connections.

Authors:  Mei-Ling Ting Lee; G A Whitmore
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Two new defective distributions based on the Marshall-Olkin extension.

Authors:  Ricardo Rocha; Saralees Nadarajah; Vera Tomazella; Francisco Louzada
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Cure modeling in real-time prediction: How much does it help?

Authors:  Gui-Shuang Ying; Qiang Zhang; Yu Lan; Yimei Li; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  An extended poisson family of life distribution: a unified approach in competitive and complementary risks.

Authors:  Pedro L Ramos; Dipak K Dey; Francisco Louzada; Victor H Lachos
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 1.416

5.  Ornstein-Uhlenbeck threshold regression for time-to-event data with and without a cure fraction.

Authors:  Roger Erich; Michael L Pennell
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Prediction of Postoperative Complications for Patients of End Stage Renal Disease.

Authors:  Young-Seob Jeong; Juhyun Kim; Dahye Kim; Jiyoung Woo; Mun Gyu Kim; Hun Woo Choi; Ah Reum Kang; Sun Young Park
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Evaluation of the Factors Affecting the Cure Rate of Cervical Intra-Epithelial Neoplasia Recurrence Using Defective Models.

Authors:  Nastaran Hajizadeh; Ahmad Reza Baghestani; Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi; Ali Akbar Khadem Maboudi; Farah Farzaneh; Nafiseh Faghih
Journal:  J Res Health Sci       Date:  2021-07-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.