Literature DB >> 19122636

A role for self-gravity at multiple length scales in the process of star formation.

Alyssa A Goodman1, Erik W Rosolowsky, Michelle A Borkin, Jonathan B Foster, Michael Halle, Jens Kauffmann, Jaime E Pineda.   

Abstract

Self-gravity plays a decisive role in the final stages of star formation, where dense cores (size approximately 0.1 parsecs) inside molecular clouds collapse to form star-plus-disk systems. But self-gravity's role at earlier times (and on larger length scales, such as approximately 1 parsec) is unclear; some molecular cloud simulations that do not include self-gravity suggest that 'turbulent fragmentation' alone is sufficient to create a mass distribution of dense cores that resembles, and sets, the stellar initial mass function. Here we report a 'dendrogram' (hierarchical tree-diagram) analysis that reveals that self-gravity plays a significant role over the full range of possible scales traced by (13)CO observations in the L1448 molecular cloud, but not everywhere in the observed region. In particular, more than 90 per cent of the compact 'pre-stellar cores' traced by peaks of dust emission are projected on the sky within one of the dendrogram's self-gravitating 'leaves'. As these peaks mark the locations of already-forming stars, or of those probably about to form, a self-gravitating cocoon seems a critical condition for their existence. Turbulent fragmentation simulations without self-gravity-even of unmagnetized isothermal material-can yield mass and velocity power spectra very similar to what is observed in clouds like L1448. But a dendrogram of such a simulation shows that nearly all the gas in it (much more than in the observations) appears to be self-gravitating. A potentially significant role for gravity in 'non-self-gravitating' simulations suggests inconsistency in simulation assumptions and output, and that it is necessary to include self-gravity in any realistic simulation of the star-formation process on subparsec scales.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19122636      PMCID: PMC3817203          DOI: 10.1038/nature07609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  2 in total

1.  Visualizing business data with generalized treemaps.

Authors:  Roel Vliegen; Jarke J van Wijk; Erik-Jan van der Linden
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.579

2.  Visualization of barrier tree sequences.

Authors:  Christian Heine; Gerik Scheuermann; Christoph Flamm; Ivo L Hofacker; Peter F Stadler
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.579

  2 in total
  5 in total

1.  Astrophysics: Star formation branches out.

Authors:  Ralph E Pudritz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Counterpoint: Do not opine before it's time.

Authors:  Isaac S Kohane; David M Margulies
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Point: Are we prepared for the future doctor visit?

Authors:  Stephen H Friend; Trey Ideker
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Effectively incorporating selected multimedia content into medical publications.

Authors:  Alexander Ziegler; Daniel Mietchen; Cornelius Faber; Wolfram von Hausen; Christoph Schöbel; Markus Sellerer; Andreas Ziegler
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 8.775

5.  Embedding and publishing interactive, 3-dimensional, scientific figures in Portable Document Format (PDF) files.

Authors:  David G Barnes; Michail Vidiassov; Bernhard Ruthensteiner; Christopher J Fluke; Michelle R Quayle; Colin R McHenry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.