Literature DB >> 19121983

Biomimetic chitosan-nanohydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

W W Thein-Han1, R D K Misra.   

Abstract

We describe a comparative assessment of the structure-property-process relationship of three-dimensional chitosan-nanohydroxyapatite (nHA) and pure chitosan scaffolds in conjunction with their respective biological response with the aim of advancing our insight into aspects that concern bone tissue engineering. High- and medium-molecular-weight (MW) chitosan scaffolds with 0.5, 1 and 2 wt.% fraction of nHA were fabricated by freezing and lyophilization. The nanocomposites were characterized by a highly porous structure and the pore size (approximately 50 to 120 microm) was in a similar range for the scaffolds with different content of nHA. A combination of X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and electron microscopy indicated that nHA particles were uniformly dispersed in chitosan matrix and there was a chemical interaction between chitosan and nHA. The compression modulus of hydrated chitosan scaffolds was increased on the addition of 1 wt.% nHA from 6.0 to 9.2 kPa in high-MW scaffold. The water uptake ability of composites decreased with an increase in the amount of nHA, while the water retention ability was similar to pure chitosan scaffold. After 28 days in physiological condition, nanocomposites indicated about 10% lower degree of degradation in comparison to chitosan scaffold. The biological response of pre-osteoblasts (MC 3T3-E1) on nanocomposite scaffolds was superior in terms of improved cell attachment, higher proliferation, and well-spread morphology in relation to chitosan scaffold. In composite scaffolds, cell proliferation was about 1.5 times greater than pure chitosan after 7 days of culture and beyond, as implied by qualitative analysis via fluorescence microscopy and quantitative study through MTT assay. The observations related to well-developed structure morphology, physicochemical properties and superior cytocompatibility suggest that chitosan-nHA porous scaffolds are potential candidate materials for bone regeneration although it is necessary to further enhance the mechanical properties of the nanocomposite.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19121983     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.11.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  63 in total

1.  Cross-linked chitosan improves the mechanical properties of calcium phosphate-chitosan cement.

Authors:  Ashkan Aryaei; Jason Liu; Ahalapitiya H Jayatissa; A Champa Jayasuriya
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 7.328

2.  Osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in freeze-gelled chitosan/nano β-tricalcium phosphate porous scaffolds crosslinked with genipin.

Authors:  Nadeem Siddiqui; Krishna Pramanik; Esmaiel Jabbari
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 7.328

3.  Control of the pore architecture in three-dimensional hydroxyapatite-reinforced hydrogel scaffolds.

Authors:  Jesús Román; María Victoria Cabañas; Juan Peña; María Vallet-Regí
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 8.090

Review 4.  Biocomposites and hybrid biomaterials based on calcium orthophosphates.

Authors:  Sergey V Dorozhkin
Journal:  Biomatter       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep

5.  Towards high throughput tissue engineering: development of chitosan-calcium phosphate scaffolds for engineering bone tissue from embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Junghyuk Ko; Kathleen Kolehmainen; Farid Ahmed; Martin Bg Jun; Stephanie M Willerth
Journal:  Am J Stem Cells       Date:  2011-10-20

6.  Electrospinning Nanofiber-Reinforced Aerogels for the Treatment of Bone Defects.

Authors:  Yishan Zhang; Chengcheng Yin; Yuet Cheng; Xiangyu Huang; Kai Liu; Gu Cheng; Zubing Li
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 7.  3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Gareth Turnbull; Jon Clarke; Frédéric Picard; Philip Riches; Luanluan Jia; Fengxuan Han; Bin Li; Wenmiao Shu
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2017-12-01

8.  Comparative investigation of porous nano-hydroxyapaptite/chitosan, nano-zirconia/chitosan and novel nano-calcium zirconate/chitosan composite scaffolds for their potential applications in bone regeneration.

Authors:  Bipin Gaihre; Ambalangodage C Jayasuriya
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 7.328

9.  Regenerated silk materials for functionalized silk orthopedic devices by mimicking natural processing.

Authors:  Chunmei Li; Blake Hotz; Shengjie Ling; Jin Guo; Dylan S Haas; Benedetto Marelli; Fiorenzo Omenetto; Samuel J Lin; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Chitosan-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Sheeny Lan Levengood; Miqin Zhang
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 6.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.