OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the sensitivity of F-18 fluoride and F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET) in the diagnosis of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ), and to test their suitability for assessing the severity of BRONJ. STUDY DESIGN: Nine patients with BRONJ were studied using F-18 fluoride and F-18 FDG PET. For analysis, 8 regions of interest (ROI) were defined in the jaws of each patient. Maximum count rates for each ROI in both PET examinations were analyzed. RESULTS: In both studies, increased tracer enhancement was observed in regions with BRONJ. Uptake of fluoride significantly exceeded that of FDG. FDG uptake increased systematically, but not significantly, with increasing severity of BRONJ. CONCLUSION: F-18 fluoride PET is a sensitive method for diagnosis of BRONJ. FDG PET could be useful for evaluation of the severity of BRONJ. Further studies are required to prove the specificity of the methods.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the sensitivity of F-18 fluoride and F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET) in the diagnosis of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ), and to test their suitability for assessing the severity of BRONJ. STUDY DESIGN: Nine patients with BRONJ were studied using F-18 fluoride and F-18 FDG PET. For analysis, 8 regions of interest (ROI) were defined in the jaws of each patient. Maximum count rates for each ROI in both PET examinations were analyzed. RESULTS: In both studies, increased tracer enhancement was observed in regions with BRONJ. Uptake of fluoride significantly exceeded that of FDG. FDG uptake increased systematically, but not significantly, with increasing severity of BRONJ. CONCLUSION:F-18 fluoride PET is a sensitive method for diagnosis of BRONJ. FDG PET could be useful for evaluation of the severity of BRONJ. Further studies are required to prove the specificity of the methods.
Authors: M Beheshti; F M Mottaghy; F Paycha; F F F Behrendt; T Van den Wyngaert; I Fogelman; K Strobel; M Celli; S Fanti; F Giammarile; B Krause; W Langsteger Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-07-23 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: D Yoshiga; M Sasaguri; K Matsuo; S Kokuryou; M Habu; M Oda; M Kodama; H Tsurushima; O Sakaguchi; T Sakurai; J Tanaka; Y Morimoto; I Yoshioka; K Tominaga Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: William Raynor; Sina Houshmand; Saeid Gholami; Sahra Emamzadehfard; Chamith S Rajapakse; Björn Alexander Blomberg; Thomas J Werner; Poul F Høilund-Carlsen; Joshua F Baker; Abass Alavi Journal: Curr Osteoporos Rep Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 5.096
Authors: Carmen Bolouri; Michael Merwald; Martin W Huellner; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Johannes Kuttenberger; Marisol Pérez-Lago; Burkhardt Seifert; Klaus Strobel Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-11-14 Impact factor: 9.236