Literature DB >> 19121736

Biomechanical comparison of modified Kessler and running suture repair in 3 different animal tendons and in human flexor tendons.

Jan-Till Hausmann1, György Vekszler, Manfred Bijak, Thomas Benesch, Vilmos Vécsei, Christian Gäbler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To establish the animal flexor tendon that best mimics the biomechanical performance of human flexor tendons. We investigated the biomechanical behavior of core and running sutures in 3 different animal flexor tendons and in human flexor tendons. Additionally, we attempted to help standardize future flexor tendon studies. To that purpose, nearly all variables occurring in the test setup have been highlighted.
METHODS: The species selected were pig, calf, sheep, and human. Two groups were formed. In the first group we tested 3-0 core sutures (Ticron; Tyco Healthcare, Vienna, Austria), and in the second group we tested 5-0 running sutures (Ethilon; Ethicon, Vienna, Austria). In each group, 10 tendons of each specimen were tested, which yielded a total of 80 tendons. In each group, the repaired tendons were subjected to 3,000 linear load cycles at a load of 15 N. At the end of this procedure, final gap values were recorded. In the next step, ultimate load-to-failure data were obtained from each specimen.
RESULTS: Core sutures behaved similarly in the human, sheep, and pig tendons with respect to ultimate loads. With respect to gap formation, core sutures behaved similarly in the human, sheep, and calf tendons. Deep running sutures behaved similarly in the human, sheep, and pig tendons in terms of ultimate load to failure.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, sheep tendons were found to best mimic the biomechanical behavior of human tendons. Calf tendons seem to be unsuitable. There is a strong need for consistency in biomechanical test setups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19121736     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  7 in total

1.  Converting round tendons to flat tendon constructs: Does the preparation process have an influence on the structural properties?

Authors:  C Domnick; M Herbort; M J Raschke; B Schliemann; R Siebold; R Śmigielski; C Fink
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Biomechanical and Dimensional Measurements of the Pulvertaft Weave Versus the Cow-Hitch Technique.

Authors:  Nanette L A Vincken; Thomas M A S Lauwers; Rene R W J van der Hulst
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-04-29

3.  The Interlocking Modification of the Cross Locked Cruciate Tendon Repair (Modified Adelaide Repair): A Static and Dynamic Biomechanical Assessment.

Authors:  Ramon Tahmassebi; Tim S Peltz; Roger Haddad; Peter Scougall; Mark Gianoutsos; William Walsh
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2014-07-04

4.  Whip stitch versus grasping suture for tendon autograft.

Authors:  Ruy E da Assunção; Roger Haddad; Warwick J M Bruce; Peter Walker; William R Walsh
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2011-12-20

5.  Design of an electrospun tubular construct combining a mechanical and biological approach to improve tendon repair.

Authors:  N Pien; Y Van de Maele; L Parmentier; M Meeremans; A Mignon; C De Schauwer; I Peeters; L De Wilde; A Martens; D Mantovani; S Van Vlierberghe; P Dubruel
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.727

6.  A barbed suture repair for flexor tendons: a novel technique with no exposed barbs.

Authors:  Cormac W Joyce; Conor Sugrue; Jeffrey C Chan; Luis Delgado; Dimitrios Zeugolis; Seam M Carroll; Jack L Kelly
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-11-07

7.  An In Vivo Comparison: Novel Mesh Suture Versus Traditional Suture-Based Repair in a Rabbit Tendon Model.

Authors:  Lindsay E Janes; Lauren M Mioton; Megan E Fracol; Jason H Ko
Journal:  J Hand Surg Glob Online       Date:  2021-11-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.