Literature DB >> 19121443

Usefulness of baseline electrocardiographic QRS complex pattern to predict response to cardiac resynchronization.

Evan C Adelstein1, Samir Saba.   

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure with QRS>120 ms, yet most patients studied in clinical trials manifested baseline left branch bundle block (LBBB). It is unclear whether benefits of CRT extend to patients with right branch bundle block (RBBB) or a paced QRS at baseline despite QRS>120 ms. Orthotopic heart transplantation- and ventricular assist device-free survival, symptomatic response, and echocardiographic response were evaluated in the 636 patients who underwent CRT at our institution from 2000 to 2007 in whom the baseline electrocardiogram showed LBBB (n=412; 65%), paced QRS (n=162; 26%), or RBBB (n=62; 10%). Mortality was assessed using the Social Security Death Index, and the medical record was analyzed for clinical data. A decrease in New York Heart Association class>or=0.5 after >or=6 months of CRT defined symptomatic response. Echocardiographic evidence of improved left ventricular function and reverse remodeling was evaluated after >or=6 months of CRT. Survival free from orthotopic heart transplantation and ventricular assist device placement was best in patients with LBBB and worst in those with RBBB, whereas patients with paced QRS had an intermediate prognosis (p=0.003). This finding remained significant after controlling for baseline differences among the 3 groups. Symptomatic response was observed most often in patients with LBBB (60%), occurred least often in patients with RBBB (14%), and was intermediate in patients with paced QRS (46%; p<0.001). Echocardiographic improvement showed a similar stepwise trend. In conclusion, patients with RBBB undergoing CRT had low rates of symptomatic and echocardiographic response, and their survival free from orthotopic heart transplantation or ventricular assist device placement was significantly worse than in patients with LBBB. Patients with conventionally paced QRS experienced an intermediate response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19121443     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.08.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  27 in total

1.  An early proof-of-concept of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Martial G Bourassa; Paul Khairy; Denis Roy
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-26

2.  Global and regional ventricular repolarization study by body surface potential mapping in patients with left bundle-branch block and heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Roberto A G Douglas; Nelson Samesima; Martino M Filho; Anísio A Pedrosa; Silvana A D Nishioka; Carlos A Pastore
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 3.  Effect of QRS morphology on clinical event reduction with cardiac resynchronization therapy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ilke Sipahi; Josephine C Chou; Marshall Hyden; Douglas Y Rowland; Daniel I Simon; James C Fang
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Mechanical Dyssynchrony: A Risk Factor but not a Target.

Authors:  Amil M Shah; Scott D Solomon
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Periprocedural management of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  John Rickard; Niraj Varma
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-04

6.  Effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in diabetic patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Jenie George; Alon Barsheshet; Arthur J Moss; David Martin; Gregory Ouellet; Scott McNitt; Ilan Goldenberg
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 7.  Targeting left ventricular lead placement to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes.

Authors:  Jeffrey Liu; Evan Adelstein; Samir Saba
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Bundle-branch block morphology and other predictors of outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy in Medicare patients.

Authors:  Kenneth C Bilchick; Sandeep Kamath; John P DiMarco; George J Stukenborg
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  [Cardiac resynchronization therapy: preoperative screening. How can we reliably predict response to CRT?].

Authors:  M Kindermann; F Mahfoud; C Ukena; G Fröhlig
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2009-09

10.  Acute improvement of cardiac efficiency measured by 11C-acetate PET after cardiac resynchronization therapy and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Kenji Kitaizumi; Kazushi Yukiiri; Hisashi Masugata; Hiroyuki Takinami; Yasuyoshi Iwado; Takahisa Noma; Naohisa Hosomi; Koji Ohmori; Shoichi Senda; Masakazu Kohno
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.