OBJECTIVES: To describe our experience using satellite image-based sampling to conduct a health survey of children in an urban area of Lusaka, Zambia, as an approach to sampling when the population is poorly characterized by existing census data or maps. METHODS: Using a publicly available Quickbird image of several townships, we created digital records of structures within the residential urban study area using ArcGIS 9.2. Boundaries were drawn to create geographic subdivisions based on natural and man-made barriers (e.g. roads). Survey teams of biomedical research students and local community health workers followed a standard protocol to enroll children within the selected structure, or to move to the neighbouring structure if the selected structure was ineligible or refused enrollment. Spatial clustering was assessed using the K-difference function. RESULTS: Digital records of 16 105 structures within the study area were created. Of the 750 randomly selected structures, six (1%) were not found by the survey teams. A total of 1247 structures were assessed for eligibility, of which 691 eligible households were enrolled. The majority of enrolled households were the initially selected structures (51%) or the first selected neighbour (42%). Households that refused enrollment tended to cluster more than those which enrolled. CONCLUSIONS: Sampling from a satellite image was feasible in this urban African setting. Satellite images may be useful for public health surveillance in populations with inaccurate census data or maps and allow for spatial analyses such as identification of clustering among refusing households.
OBJECTIVES: To describe our experience using satellite image-based sampling to conduct a health survey of children in an urban area of Lusaka, Zambia, as an approach to sampling when the population is poorly characterized by existing census data or maps. METHODS: Using a publicly available Quickbird image of several townships, we created digital records of structures within the residential urban study area using ArcGIS 9.2. Boundaries were drawn to create geographic subdivisions based on natural and man-made barriers (e.g. roads). Survey teams of biomedical research students and local community health workers followed a standard protocol to enroll children within the selected structure, or to move to the neighbouring structure if the selected structure was ineligible or refused enrollment. Spatial clustering was assessed using the K-difference function. RESULTS: Digital records of 16 105 structures within the study area were created. Of the 750 randomly selected structures, six (1%) were not found by the survey teams. A total of 1247 structures were assessed for eligibility, of which 691 eligible households were enrolled. The majority of enrolled households were the initially selected structures (51%) or the first selected neighbour (42%). Households that refused enrollment tended to cluster more than those which enrolled. CONCLUSIONS: Sampling from a satellite image was feasible in this urban African setting. Satellite images may be useful for public health surveillance in populations with inaccurate census data or maps and allow for spatial analyses such as identification of clustering among refusing households.
Authors: Timothy Shields; Jessie Pinchoff; Jailos Lubinda; Harry Hamapumbu; Kelly Searle; Tamaki Kobayashi; Philip E Thuma; William J Moss; Frank C Curriero Journal: Geospat Health Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 1.212
Authors: Ursula Panzner; Gi Deok Pak; Peter Aaby; Yaw Adu-Sarkodie; Mohammad Ali; Abraham Aseffa; Stephen Baker; Morten Bjerregaard-Andersen; John A Crump; Jessica Deerin; Ligia Maria Cruz Espinoza; Nagla Gasmelseed; Jean Noël Heriniaina; Julian T Hertz; Justin Im; Vera von Kalckreuth; Karen H Keddy; Bruno Lankoande; Sandra Løfberg; Christian G Meyer; Michael Munishi Oresto; Jin Kyung Park; Se Eun Park; Raphaël Rakotozandrindrainy; Nimako Sarpong; Abdramane Bassiahi Soura; Amy Gassama Sow; Adama Tall; Mekonnen Teferi; Alemayehu Worku; Biruk Yeshitela; Thomas F Wierzba; Florian Marks Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Jessie Pinchoff; Mike Chaponda; Timothy Shields; James Lupiya; Tamaki Kobayashi; Modest Mulenga; William J Moss; Frank C Curriero Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2015-09-28 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Mufaro Kanyangarara; Edmore Mamini; Sungano Mharakurwa; Shungu Munyati; Lovemore Gwanzura; Tamaki Kobayashi; Timothy Shields; Luke C Mullany; Susan Mutambu; Peter R Mason; Frank C Curriero; William J Moss Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2016-04-25 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Mufaro Kanyangarara; Edmore Mamini; Sungano Mharakurwa; Shungu Munyati; Lovemore Gwanzura; Tamaki Kobayashi; Timothy Shields; Luke C Mullany; Susan Mutambu; Peter R Mason; Frank C Curriero; William J Moss Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2016-04-25 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Lorenzo Pezzoli; Ishata Conteh; Wogba Kamara; Marta Gacic-Dobo; Olivier Ronveaux; William A Perea; Rosamund F Lewis Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-06-07 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Catherine G Sutcliffe; Tamaki Kobayashi; Harry Hamapumbu; Timothy Shields; Sungano Mharakurwa; Philip E Thuma; Thomas A Louis; Gregory Glass; William J Moss Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-02-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: F Grandesso; M Allan; P S J Jean-Simon; J Boncy; A Blake; R Pierre; K P Alberti; A Munger; G Elder; D Olson; K Porten; F J Luquero Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2013-10-11 Impact factor: 4.434
Authors: Jessie Pinchoff; German Henostroza; Bryan S Carter; Sarah T Roberts; Sisa Hatwiinda; Busiku Hamainza; Moonga Hawela; Frank C Curriero Journal: Malar J Date: 2015-08-07 Impact factor: 2.979