Literature DB >> 19120567

Coerced medication in psychiatric inpatient care: literature review.

Manuela Jarrett1, Len Bowers, Alan Simpson.   

Abstract

AIM: This paper is a report of a narrative review of the coercive use of medication in inpatient psychiatric care to identify a demographic and clinical profile of patients who are forcibly medicated, and to examine patient and staff views of this practice.
BACKGROUND: Lack of compliance with medication is associated with quicker relapse and increased risk to self and others in mental disorder. It is this increased risk which provides the ethical and legal grounds for detaining and treating psychiatric patients without their consent. Legislation for involuntary psychiatric treatment exists in all European Union member states and in other western countries. DATA SOURCES: Online bibliographic databases from 1980 to 2008 were searched, including British Nursing Index, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE and MEDLINE. Search terms relating to coercion, force, chemical restraint, rapid tranquilization, inpatients and psychiatry were used. REVIEW
METHODS: Titles and abstracts were reviewed. All peer reviewed papers concerning coercion in the administration of medication in inpatient psychiatric care were included and a narrative review was conducted.
RESULTS: Fourteen papers from seven countries were included. Patients who have experience coerced medication tend to be aged in their 30s, with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar or other psychotic disorders, and are often involuntarily admitted. Assault or threat of assault is the main reason for giving forced medication.
CONCLUSION: There is a dearth of literature in the area of coercion in administration of medication and much more research is needed examining all aspects of this contentious practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19120567     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04832.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Compulsory treatment under legal uncertainty: part 2: consequences of legal uncertainty in clinical practice - suggestions for improvement].

Authors:  S Müller; H Walter; H Kunze; N Konrad; A Heinz
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Variables associated with the use of coercive measures on psychiatric patients in Spanish penitentiary centers.

Authors:  E Girela; A López; L Ortega; J De-Juan; F Ruiz; J I Bosch; L F Barrios; J D Luna; F Torres-González
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Clinical and organizational factors related to the reduction of mechanical restraint application in an acute ward: an 8-year retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Rosaria Di Lorenzo; Fiorenza Miani; Vitantonio Formicola; Paola Ferri
Journal:  Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health       Date:  2014-10-03

4.  A case report of guardian-consent forced paliperidone palmitate for behavioral disturbance due to traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Amber R Douglass; Uyen Smyth
Journal:  Ment Health Clin       Date:  2018-04-26

5.  Comparing Attitudes to Containment Measures of Patients, Health Care Professionals and Next of Kin.

Authors:  Thomas Reisch; Simone Beeri; Georges Klein; Philipp Meier; Philippe Pfeifer; Etienne Buehler; Florian Hotzy; Matthias Jaeger
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 6.  Coercive Measures in Psychiatry: A Review of Ethical Arguments.

Authors:  Marie Chieze; Christine Clavien; Stefan Kaiser; Samia Hurst
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.157

7.  Effect of the introduction of immediate judge's decisions in 2018 on the use of coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals in Germany: a population-based study.

Authors:  Erich Flammer; Sophie Hirsch; Tilman Steinert
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2021-11-04

8.  Fear, Neglect, Coercion, and Dehumanization: Is Inpatient Psychiatric Trauma Contributing to a Public Health Crisis?

Authors:  Nourredine Jina-Pettersen
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2022-08-09

Review 9.  Understanding psychiatric institutionalization: a conceptual review.

Authors:  Winnie S Chow; Stefan Priebe
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.630

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.