Literature DB >> 19119995

On the computational complexity of the reticulate cophylogeny reconstruction problem.

Ran Libeskind-Hadas1, Michael A Charleston.   

Abstract

The cophylogeny reconstruction problem is that of finding minimal cost explanations of differences between evolutionary histories of ecologically linked groups of biological organisms. We present a proof that shows that the general problem of reconciling evolutionary histories is NP-complete and provide a sharp boundary where this intractability begins. We also show that a related problem, that of finding Pareto optimal solutions, is NP-hard. As a byproduct of our results, we give a framework by which meta-heuristics can be applied to find good solutions to this problem.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19119995     DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2008.0084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Biol        ISSN: 1066-5277            Impact factor:   1.479


  22 in total

1.  Reconciliation revisited: handling multiple optima when reconciling with duplication, transfer, and loss.

Authors:  Mukul S Bansal; Eric J Alm; Manolis Kellis
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Biologically feasible gene trees, reconciliation maps and informative triples.

Authors:  Marc Hellmuth
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 1.405

3.  Jane: a new tool for the cophylogeny reconstruction problem.

Authors:  Chris Conow; Daniel Fielder; Yaniv Ovadia; Ran Libeskind-Hadas
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 1.405

4.  Efficient algorithms for reconciling gene trees and species networks via duplication and loss events.

Authors:  Thu-Hien To; Celine Scornavacca
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Efficient algorithms for the reconciliation problem with gene duplication, horizontal transfer and loss.

Authors:  Mukul S Bansal; Eric J Alm; Manolis Kellis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Cubic time algorithms of amalgamating gene trees and building evolutionary scenarios.

Authors:  Vassily A Lyubetsky; Lev I Rubanov; Leonid Y Rusin; Konstantin Yu Gorbunov
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 4.540

7.  A parameter-adaptive dynamic programming approach for inferring cophylogenies.

Authors:  Daniel Merkle; Martin Middendorf; Nicolas Wieseke
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  An extreme case of plant-insect codiversification: figs and fig-pollinating wasps.

Authors:  Astrid Cruaud; Nina Rønsted; Bhanumas Chantarasuwan; Lien Siang Chou; Wendy L Clement; Arnaud Couloux; Benjamin Cousins; Gwenaëlle Genson; Rhett D Harrison; Paul E Hanson; Martine Hossaert-McKey; Roula Jabbour-Zahab; Emmanuelle Jousselin; Carole Kerdelhué; Finn Kjellberg; Carlos Lopez-Vaamonde; John Peebles; Yan-Qiong Peng; Rodrigo Augusto Santinelo Pereira; Tselil Schramm; Rosichon Ubaidillah; Simon van Noort; George D Weiblen; Da-Rong Yang; Anak Yodpinyanee; Ran Libeskind-Hadas; James M Cook; Jean-Yves Rasplus; Vincent Savolainen
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 15.683

9.  Improved gene tree error correction in the presence of horizontal gene transfer.

Authors:  Mukul S Bansal; Yi-Chieh Wu; Eric J Alm; Manolis Kellis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Reconciliation of gene and species trees.

Authors:  L Y Rusin; E V Lyubetskaya; K Y Gorbunov; V A Lyubetsky
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.