OBJECT: Thoracolumbar intraspinal subependymomas are very rare intramedullary low-grade tumors. The authors report on the clinical and morphological features of 2 cases of thoracolumbar intraspinal subependymomas and provide midterm follow-up data. METHODS: The clinical and radiological profiles of 2 patients with progressive spinal cord dysfunction due to thoracolumbar intraspinal subependymomas were retrospectively studied and compared with previously reported cases. RESULTS: Patients with intraspinal subependymomas initially presented with back pain and long-tract signs. The tumors were hyperintense on T2-weighted MR imaging, isointense on T1-weighted imaging, and noncontrast enhancing. Within 1 of the tumors, a medial septum was present on axial T2-weighted imaging. The tumors were intramedullary but grew exophytically and were amenable to gentle surgical separation from normal neural structures. Therefore, gross-total resection was feasible, and neurological outcome was good. No further adjuvant therapy was conducted. On follow-up (at 58 and 18 months, respectively), no tumor recurrence was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic thoracolumbar intraspinal subependymomas with a distinct appearance on MR imaging are amenable to complete excision with favorable neurological outcome. In this study no tumor recurrence was observed at midterm follow-up in either patient, neither of whom underwent adjuvant therapy.
OBJECT: Thoracolumbar intraspinal subependymomas are very rare intramedullary low-grade tumors. The authors report on the clinical and morphological features of 2 cases of thoracolumbar intraspinal subependymomas and provide midterm follow-up data. METHODS: The clinical and radiological profiles of 2 patients with progressive spinal cord dysfunction due to thoracolumbar intraspinal subependymomas were retrospectively studied and compared with previously reported cases. RESULTS:Patients with intraspinal subependymomas initially presented with back pain and long-tract signs. The tumors were hyperintense on T2-weighted MR imaging, isointense on T1-weighted imaging, and noncontrast enhancing. Within 1 of the tumors, a medial septum was present on axial T2-weighted imaging. The tumors were intramedullary but grew exophytically and were amenable to gentle surgical separation from normal neural structures. Therefore, gross-total resection was feasible, and neurological outcome was good. No further adjuvant therapy was conducted. On follow-up (at 58 and 18 months, respectively), no tumor recurrence was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic thoracolumbar intraspinal subependymomas with a distinct appearance on MR imaging are amenable to complete excision with favorable neurological outcome. In this study no tumor recurrence was observed at midterm follow-up in either patient, neither of whom underwent adjuvant therapy.