Literature DB >> 19119402

Upper Limb Neural Tension and Seated Slump Tests: The False Positive Rate among Healthy Young Adults without Cervical or Lumbar Symptoms.

D Scott Davis1, Ila Beth Anderson, Mary Grace Carson, Caroline L Elkins, Lindsey B Stuckey.   

Abstract

This study examined the false positive rate of the upper limb neural tension test (ULNTT) and seated slump test (SST) among healthy young adults with no history of cervical, lumbar, or peripheral symptoms. Eighty-four subjects (27 men and 57 women) with a mean age of 22.9 years participated in the investigation. All participants completed a screening questionnaire designed to exclude subjects with a history of cervical or lumbar spine pain or injury, or upper or lower extremity neurological symptoms. The ULNTT and the SST were performed on the left upper and lower extremity of each participant. Of the 84 participants tested, 73 (86.9%) were found to have a positive ULNTT at some point in the available range of elbow extension. Twenty-eight (33.3%) of the 84 subjects had a positive SST at some point in the available range of knee extension. The mean knee extension angle for those subjects with a positive SST was 15.1 degrees with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 12.3 and 19.7 degrees . The mean elbow extension angle for those with a positive ULNTT was 49.4 degrees with a 95% CI of 44.8 and 54.0 degrees . The number of positive tests for both the ULNTT and the SST was found to be high in this sample of asymptomatic healthy young adults. Based on the results of this investigation, the authors suggest that the current criteria for determining a positive test for both the ULNTT and the SST should be examined using the proposed range of motion cut-off scores.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neural Tension Testing; Neurodynamics; Radiculopathy; Test Validity

Year:  2008        PMID: 19119402      PMCID: PMC2582423          DOI: 10.1179/jmt.2008.16.3.136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Man Manip Ther        ISSN: 1066-9817


  22 in total

1.  Spectrum bias or spectrum effect? Subgroup variation in diagnostic test evaluation.

Authors:  Stephanie A Mulherin; William C Miller
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  Upper limb neural tension testing and mobilization. Fact, fiction, and a practical approach.

Authors:  Mark T Walsh
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.950

3.  A modified upper limb tension test: An investigation of responses in normal subjects.

Authors:  G A Yaxley; G A Jull
Journal:  Aust J Physiother       Date:  1991

4.  The inter-therapist reliability of the slump test.

Authors:  K Philip; P Lew; T A Matyas
Journal:  Aust J Physiother       Date:  1989

5.  Differential diagnosis and management of spinal nerve root-related pain.

Authors:  Phillip S Sizer; Valerie Phelps; Greg Dedrick; Omer Matthijs
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Pain due to peripheral nerve damage: an hypothesis.

Authors:  A K Asbury; H L Fields
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  The slump test: the effects of head and lower extremity position on knee extension.

Authors:  E K Johnson; C M Chiarello
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  Development of a clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Robert S Wainner; Julie M Fritz; James J Irrgang; Anthony Delitto; Stephen Allison; Michael L Boninger
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Validity of five common manual neck pain provoking tests.

Authors:  H Sandmark; R Nisell
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1995-09

10.  Slump test: sensory responses in asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Jeremy Walsh; Miriam Flatley; Niall Johnston; Kathleen Bennett
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2007
View more
  9 in total

1.  Author response.

Authors:  D Scott Davis
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2009

2.  Re: "Upper Limb Neural Tension and Seated Slump Tests: The False Positive Rate Among Healthy Young Adults without Cervical or Lumbar Symptoms" Daves et al. J Man Manip Ther 2009;16:136-141.

Authors:  Richard Ellis
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2009

3.  Are movement-based classification systems more effective than therapeutic exercise or guideline based care in improving outcomes for patients with chronic low back pain? A systematic review.

Authors:  Sean P Riley; Brian T Swanson; Elizabeth Dyer
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2018-10-17

4.  Impact of shoulder internal rotation on normal sensory response during ulnar nerve-biased neurodynamic testing of asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Mark Gugliotti; Danielle Cohen; Angela Hernandez; Kristen Hinrichs; Nicole Osmundsen
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-05-10

5.  The influence of scapular depression on upper limb neurodynamic test responses.

Authors:  Allison Legakis; Benjamin S Boyd
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-05

Review 6.  Clinical classification in low back pain: best-evidence diagnostic rules based on systematic reviews.

Authors:  Tom Petersen; Mark Laslett; Carsten Juhl
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Upper Limb Neurodynamic Test 1 on Healthy Individuals: Intra- and Intersession Reliability of the Angle between Pain Onset and Submaximal Pain.

Authors:  Diego Leoni; Davide Storer; Roberto Gatti; Michele Egloff; Marco Barbero
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.037

8.  Effects of a supervised exercise program in addition to electrical stimulation or kinesio taping in low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  María Encarnación Aguilar-Ferrándiz; Guillermo A Matarán-Peñarrocha; Rosa María Tapia-Haro; Yolanda Castellote-Caballero; Celia Martí-García; Adelaida María Castro-Sánchez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Use of Neurodynamic or Orthopedic Tension Tests for the Diagnosis of Lumbar and Lumbosacral Radiculopathies: Study of the Diagnostic Validity.

Authors:  Francisco Javier González Espinosa de Los Monteros; Gloria Gonzalez-Medina; Elisa Maria Garrido Ardila; Juan Rodríguez Mansilla; José Paz Expósito; Petronila Oliva Ruiz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.