Literature DB >> 19119343

CNAP To Predict Functional Cochlear Nerve Preservation in NF-2: Cochlear Implant or Auditory Brainstem Implant.

Enrico Piccirillo1, Maurizio Guida, Sean Flanagan, Lorenzo Lauda, Paolo Fois, Mario Sanna.   

Abstract

The ideal management of bilateral vestibular schwannomas (VSs) involves complete tumor resection with preservation of hearing in at least one ear. While auditory brainstem implants (ABIs) have represented a significant advance in the management of neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF-2) patients, hearing rehabilitation is far from ideal. More recently, cochlear implantation has been used in selected cases of NF-2, following tumor removal, where the patient is left with bilateral profound hearing loss but with anatomical continuity of the cochlear nerve. In selected cases, cochlear implant (CI) has given superior results to ABI. The Gruppo Otologico experience in managing NF-2 patients consists of 29 patients treated between December 1996 and December 2007 out of a total of 1723 VSs. Thirty-nine tumors have been removed, with 10 patients having had bilateral tumor removed. Ten ABIs have been implanted and 5 CIs placed. We present a case that illustrates some of the difficulties encountered in the management of NF-2 VS and provides a basis for discussion of a technique to assist intraoperative decision-making to achieve optimal hearing rehabilitation. In the setting of a negative fast auditory brainstem response (ABR), but preserved cochlear nerve action potential (CNAP), the option of a CI can be considered. However, where the fast ABR and the morphology and amplitude of the CNAP are significantly degraded at the brainstem, the placement of an ABI should be strongly considered at the time of tumor removal. This technique must be further evaluated, but it represents an adjunct in this difficult area for the neurotologist. To this end we propose that a multicenter trial be undertaken to further elucidate the role of intraoperative monitoring to determine the functional preservation of the cochlear nerve.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CNAP; Intraoperative monitoring; NF-2; fast ABR; hearing rehabilitation

Year:  2008        PMID: 19119343      PMCID: PMC2467484          DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1043753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skull Base        ISSN: 1531-5010


  25 in total

Review 1.  Physiological basis for cochlear and auditory brainstem implants.

Authors:  Aage R Møller
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006

2.  Intraoperative auditory assessments as predictors of hearing preservation after vestibular schwannoma surgery.

Authors:  A Tucker; W H Slattery; L Solcyk; D E Brackmann
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Management of vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): auditory and facial nerve function after resection of 120 vestibular schwannomas in patients with neurofibromatosis 2.

Authors:  M Samii; C Matthies; M Tatagiba
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 4.  Cochlear implantation concurrent with translabyrinthine acoustic neuroma resection.

Authors:  Syed Ahsan; Fred Telischi; Annelle Hodges; Thomas Balkany
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Transapical extension in difficult cerebellopontine angle tumors.

Authors:  Mario Sanna; Manoj Agarwal; Fernando Mancini; Abdelkader Taibah
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.547

6.  Intraoperative cochlear nerve monitoring in vestibular schwannoma surgery--does it really affect hearing outcome?

Authors:  Enrico Piccirillo; Harukazu Hiraumi; Masashi Hamada; Alessandra Russo; Alessandro De Stefano; Mario Sanna
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  Electrical promontory stimulation in patients with intact cochlear nerve and anacusis following acoustic neuroma surgery.

Authors:  R A Cueva; B A Thedinger; J P Harris; M E Glasscock
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Cerebrospinal fluid leak after retrosigmoid excision of vestibular schwannomas.

Authors:  Maurizio Falcioni; Guglielmo Romano; Nitin Aggarwal; Mario Sanna
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Interface between the facial nerve and large acoustic neurinomas. Immunohistochemical study of the cleavage plane in NF2 and non-NF2 cases.

Authors:  J Jääskeläinen; A Paetau; I Pyykkö; G Blomstedt; T Palva; H Troupp
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Cochlear implantation in the neurofibromatosis type 2 patient: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Brian A Neff; R Mark Wiet; John M Lasak; Noel L Cohen; Harold C Pillsbury; Richard T Ramsden; D Bradley Welling
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  2 in total

1.  Auditory rehabilitation of patients with neurofibromatosis Type 2 by using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Pamela C Roehm; Jon Mallen-St Clair; Daniel Jethanamest; John G Golfinos; William Shapiro; Susan Waltzman; J Thomas Roland
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Clinical outcome of neurofibromatosis type 2-related vestibular schwannoma: treatment strategies and challenges.

Authors:  Byung Sup Kim; Ho Jun Seol; Jung-Il Lee; Hyung Jin Shin; Kwan Park; Doo-Sik Kong; Do-Hyun Nam; Yang-Sun Cho
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.042

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.