Literature DB >> 19118462

Robot-assisted ureterectomy and ureteral reconstruction for urothelial carcinoma.

Michal Glinianski1, Khurshid A Guru, Greg Zimmerman, James Mohler, Hyung L Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Urothelial carcinoma of the distal ureter can be managed by ureterectomy followed by reconstruction of the urinary system. We review our experience with robot-assisted ureterectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine consecutive patients who were candidates for ureterectomy underwent robot-assisted surgery between 7/8/2005 and 7/25/2006. Patient characteristics, intraoperative parameters, and short-term outcomes were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: Mean operative time was 252 minutes. The mean blood loss was 44 mL, and no patient needed a transfusion. The mean hospital stay was 1.5 days. Six patients needed a psoas hitch; one patient each underwent a primary ureteral anastomosis, a direct ureteral reimplant into the dome of the bladder, and distal ureterectomy for tumor in a ureteral stump after nephrectomy. The ureteral reimplant was performed intravesically in one patient and extravesically in five patients. A bladder cuff was excised in all patients who were undergoing a distal ureterectomy. All surgical margins were negative, and five patients had high-grade tumor. A ureteral stricture developed in one patient, and a patient experienced aspiration pneumonia in the postoperative period.
CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted ureterectomy and ureteral reconstruction is safe and feasible, and offers patients the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. Future studies with additional patients and longer follow-up will determine the oncologic effectiveness of this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19118462     DOI: 10.1089/end.2007.0279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  8 in total

Review 1.  Current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation and reconstruction.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Phillips; David S Wang
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Robotic assisted ureteral reimplantation: current status.

Authors:  Irina Stanasel; Anthony Atala; Ashok Hemal
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Robotic Autotransplantation and Management of Post-transplant Anastomotic Strictures: the Future Is Here.

Authors:  Tad Kroczak; Luke F Reynolds; Michael Ordon
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Risk-adapted strategy for the kidney-sparing management of upper tract tumours.

Authors:  Thomas Seisen; Pierre Colin; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  Expanding the Utilization of Robotic Procedures in Urologic Surgery.

Authors:  Tareq Aro; Michael Mullerad; Gilad E Amiel
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2017-10-16

Review 6.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reconstruction: а systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Konstantin Kolontarev; George Kasyan; Dmitry Pushkar
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2018-04-25

Review 7.  Expanding the indications of robotic surgery in urology: A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Raj P Pal; Anthony J Koupparis
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2018-08-07

Review 8.  Nephron-sparing approaches in the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: indications and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Young Hwii Ko
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.