INTRODUCTION: Objectives were to give an overview of endotoxin exposure and its determinants in sewage treatment workers, and to study exposure to culturable and non-culturable microorganisms and the applicability of the LAL assay in this work environment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 43 Dutch sewage treatment plants 470 full-shift, 123 task-based personal and 54 stationary inhalable dust samples were collected. Endotoxin concentration was determined with the LAL-assay. Mixed effects models were used to investigate possible determinants of exposure. Simultaneous parallel filter samples, impinger samples and viable total bacteria and Gram-negative bacterial samples were taken to compare analytical techniques. Filter and impinger samples were analyzed with the LAL-assay, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and fluorescence microscopy. RESULTS: Endotoxin exposure levels were moderate to low (geometric mean personal exposure 27 EU/m(3), stationary 33 EU/m(3), task-based 64 EU/m(3)), yet differences between jobs and sources and some determinants of exposure were identified. Exposure varied more from day to day than between workers. Concentrations in filter samples were higher and more consistent than in impinger samples. Fungi and Gram-positive bacteria were found in higher levels than Gram-negative bacteria. The LAL assay and GC-MS showed comparable endotoxin levels. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Endotoxin exposure in Dutch sewage treatment workers was relatively low. Comparison of sampling and analytical techniques suggests that the LAL-assay did not result in much exposure misclassification. It thus seems justified to perform filter measurements in combination with the LAL-assay to measure endotoxin exposure in sewage treatment plants.
INTRODUCTION: Objectives were to give an overview of endotoxin exposure and its determinants in sewage treatment workers, and to study exposure to culturable and non-culturable microorganisms and the applicability of the LAL assay in this work environment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 43 Dutch sewage treatment plants 470 full-shift, 123 task-based personal and 54 stationary inhalable dust samples were collected. Endotoxin concentration was determined with the LAL-assay. Mixed effects models were used to investigate possible determinants of exposure. Simultaneous parallel filter samples, impinger samples and viable total bacteria and Gram-negative bacterial samples were taken to compare analytical techniques. Filter and impinger samples were analyzed with the LAL-assay, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and fluorescence microscopy. RESULTS: Endotoxin exposure levels were moderate to low (geometric mean personal exposure 27 EU/m(3), stationary 33 EU/m(3), task-based 64 EU/m(3)), yet differences between jobs and sources and some determinants of exposure were identified. Exposure varied more from day to day than between workers. Concentrations in filter samples were higher and more consistent than in impinger samples. Fungi and Gram-positive bacteria were found in higher levels than Gram-negative bacteria. The LAL assay and GC-MS showed comparable endotoxin levels. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Endotoxin exposure in Dutch sewage treatment workers was relatively low. Comparison of sampling and analytical techniques suggests that the LAL-assay did not result in much exposure misclassification. It thus seems justified to perform filter measurements in combination with the LAL-assay to measure endotoxin exposure in sewage treatment plants.
Authors: Peter S Thorne; Sarah S Perry; Rena Saito; Patrick T O'Shaughnessy; John Mehaffy; Nervana Metwali; Thomas Keefe; Kelley J Donham; Stephen J Reynolds Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2010-06-04 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Jing Shi; Amar J Mehta; Jing-Qing Hang; Hongxi Zhang; Helian Dai; Li Su; Ellen A Eisen; David C Christiani Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Maaike Steenhof; Ilse Gosens; Maciej Strak; Krystal J Godri; Gerard Hoek; Flemming R Cassee; Ian S Mudway; Frank J Kelly; Roy M Harrison; Erik Lebret; Bert Brunekreef; Nicole A H Janssen; Raymond H H Pieters Journal: Part Fibre Toxicol Date: 2011-09-02 Impact factor: 9.400
Authors: Rachel Sklar; Zeyi Zhou; Marley Zalay; Ashley Muspratt; S Katharine Hammond Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 3.390