BACKGROUND: The importance and therapeutic value of stem cells in lymphangiogenesis are poorly understood. We evaluated the potential of human and murine mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to acquire a lymphatic phenotype in vitro and to enhance lymphatic regeneration in vivo. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed the lymphendothelial differentiation of human and murine MSCs after induction with supernatant derived from human dermal microvascular endothelial cells, isolated lymphatic endothelial cells, and purified vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-C in vitro. We used human or murine progenitor MSC lines and then characterized the lymphatic phenotype by morphology, migratory capacity, and the expression of lymphatic markers such as Prox-1, podoplanin, Lyve-1, VEGF receptor-2, and VEGF receptor-3. Using a murine lymphatic edema model, we assessed the potential of these cells to form a functional lymphatic vasculature in vivo after injection of syngeneic MSCs. Incubation with supernatant from lymphatic endothelial cells induced an endothelium-like morphology and the expression of lymphendothelial markers in both human and murine MSCs in vitro. MSCs showed migratory activity along a VEGF-C gradient, which was enhanced by VEGF-C conditioning. In vivo, the local application of MSCs resulted in a significant decrease in edema formation (-20.1%; P<0.01 versus untreated tails) after 3 weekly cell injections and restored the drainage of intradermally injected methylene blue after 7 weekly injections. CONCLUSIONS: MSCs were capable of expressing a lymphatic phenotype when exposed to lymph-inductive media and purified VEGF-C. Migratory activity toward VEGF-C in vitro suggests homing capability in vivo. Restoration of lymphatic drainage after injection of MSCs in a lymphedema model indicates that MSCs play a role in lymphatic regeneration. The potential clinical application of MSC in wound healing and reduction of lymphatic edema warrants further research.
BACKGROUND: The importance and therapeutic value of stem cells in lymphangiogenesis are poorly understood. We evaluated the potential of human and murine mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to acquire a lymphatic phenotype in vitro and to enhance lymphatic regeneration in vivo. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed the lymphendothelial differentiation of human and murine MSCs after induction with supernatant derived from human dermal microvascular endothelial cells, isolated lymphatic endothelial cells, and purified vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-C in vitro. We used human or murine progenitor MSC lines and then characterized the lymphatic phenotype by morphology, migratory capacity, and the expression of lymphatic markers such as Prox-1, podoplanin, Lyve-1, VEGF receptor-2, and VEGF receptor-3. Using a murine lymphatic edema model, we assessed the potential of these cells to form a functional lymphatic vasculature in vivo after injection of syngeneic MSCs. Incubation with supernatant from lymphatic endothelial cells induced an endothelium-like morphology and the expression of lymphendothelial markers in both human and murine MSCs in vitro. MSCs showed migratory activity along a VEGF-C gradient, which was enhanced by VEGF-C conditioning. In vivo, the local application of MSCs resulted in a significant decrease in edema formation (-20.1%; P<0.01 versus untreated tails) after 3 weekly cell injections and restored the drainage of intradermally injected methylene blue after 7 weekly injections. CONCLUSIONS: MSCs were capable of expressing a lymphatic phenotype when exposed to lymph-inductive media and purified VEGF-C. Migratory activity toward VEGF-C in vitro suggests homing capability in vivo. Restoration of lymphatic drainage after injection of MSCs in a lymphedema model indicates that MSCs play a role in lymphatic regeneration. The potential clinical application of MSC in wound healing and reduction of lymphatic edema warrants further research.
Authors: Bruce A Corliss; Mohammad S Azimi; Jennifer M Munson; Shayn M Peirce; Walter L Murfee Journal: Microcirculation Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 2.628
Authors: Lisa Volk-Draper; Radhika Patel; Nihit Bhattarai; Jie Yang; Andrew Wilber; David DeNardo; Sophia Ran Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2019-08-15 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Jason C Gardenier; Geoffrey E Hespe; Raghu P Kataru; Ira L Savetsky; Jeremy S Torrisi; Gabriela D García Nores; Joseph J Dayan; David Chang; Jamie Zampell; Inés Martínez-Corral; Sagrario Ortega; Babak J Mehrara Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2016-09-22