Literature DB >> 19118249

Cardiovascular death and nonfatal myocardial infarction in acute coronary syndrome patients receiving coronary stenting are predicted by residual platelet reactivity to ADP detected by a point-of-care assay: a 12-month follow-up.

Rossella Marcucci1, Anna Maria Gori, Rita Paniccia, Betti Giusti, Serafina Valente, Cristina Giglioli, Piergiovanni Buonamici, David Antoniucci, Rosanna Abbate, Gian Franco Gensini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical impact of platelet aggregation assessed by point-of-care assays is unknown. We sought to evaluate whether high residual platelet reactivity (RPR) to ADP during clopidogrel therapy, measured by a point-of-care assay, predicts adverse clinical events in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We used the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (Accumetrics Inc, San Diego, Calif) to determine RPR to ADP in 683 patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing dual-antiplatelet therapy who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with bare-metal or drug-eluting stent implantation. All patients received a single 600-mg clopidogrel loading dose followed by 75 mg of clopidogrel daily and 100 to 325 mg of aspirin daily. The end points of the study at follow-up of 12 months were cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and target-vessel revascularization. At a 12-month follow-up, we found 51 ischemic events (24 cardiovascular deaths [3.5%], 27 nonfatal MIs [3.9%]) and 40 target-vessel revascularizations (5.8%). By receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, the optimal cutoff value in predicting 12-month cardiovascular death and nonfatal MI was P2Y12 reaction unit values > or =240. RPR, defined in the presence of P2Y12 reaction unit values above this cutoff, was found to be a significant and independent predictor of cardiovascular death and nonfatal MI in a model that adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors, renal failure, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, multivessel disease, total stent length, bifurcation lesions, number of lesions treated, type of stent, and use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (cardiovascular death: hazard ratio 2.55, 95% CI 1.08 to 6.07, P=0.034; nonfatal MI: hazard ratio 3.36, 95% CI 1.49 to 7.58, P=0.004). No significant association was found between high RPR and the risk of target-vessel revascularization.
CONCLUSIONS: RPR to ADP with clopidogrel therapy, measured by the point-of-care assay VerifyNow P2Y12, is able to detect acute coronary syndrome patients at risk of 12-month cardiovascular death and nonfatal MI. The optimal cutoff value was identified as being 240 P2Y12 reaction units.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19118249     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.812636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  102 in total

1.  Frequency of heparin/platelet factor 4-dependent platelet antibodies in patients undergoing angioplasty and stenting for cardiovascular disease and their role for on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity.

Authors:  Thomas Gremmel; Karin Frühwirth; Christoph W Kopp; Alexandra Kaider; Sabine Steiner; Tamam Bakchoul; Ulrich J H Sachs; Renate Koppensteiner; Simon Panzer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  Phenotyping patient-derived cells for translational studies in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Stanley Y Shaw; Ari D Brettman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Correlation of high post-treatment platelet reactivity assessed by light transmittance aggregometry and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay.

Authors:  In-Suk Kim; Young-Hoon Jeong; Min-Kyung Kang; Jin-Sin Koh; Yongwhi Park; Seok-Jae Hwang; Choong Hwan Kwak; Jin-Yong Hwang; Sunjoo Kim
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  Current status of high on-treatment platelet reactivity in patients with coronary or peripheral arterial disease: Mechanisms, evaluation and clinical implications.

Authors:  Stavros Spiliopoulos; Georgios Pastromas
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-26

5.  Neurointerventional Stenting and Antiplatelet Function Testing: To Do or Not to Do?

Authors:  Tareq Kass-Hout; Yazan J Alderazi; Krishna Amuluru; Peter Jin; Carlos Ayala; Charles Prestigiacomo; Chirag D Gandhi
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2015-07

6.  Antiplatelet therapy: Personalized medicine for clopidogrel resistance?

Authors:  Jean-Sébastien Hulot; Valentin Fuster
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 7.  Antiplatelet drug 'resistance'. Part 1: mechanisms and clinical measurements.

Authors:  Joseph M Sweeny; Diana A Gorog; Valentin Fuster
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 8.  High residual platelet reactivity on clopidogrel: its significance and therapeutic challenges overcoming clopidogrel resistance.

Authors:  Torkom Garabedian; Samir Alam
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-03

Review 9.  Monitoring aspirin and clopidogrel response: testing controversies and recommendations.

Authors:  Athanasios Karathanos; Tobias Geisler
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 10.  Gender and anti-thrombotic therapy: from biology to clinical implications.

Authors:  Rossella Marcucci; Gabriele Cioni; Betti Giusti; Cinzia Fatini; Lorenza Rossi; Maddalena Pazzi; Rosanna Abbate
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.