Literature DB >> 19118182

Ongoing activity fluctuations in hMT+ bias the perception of coherent visual motion.

Guido Hesselmann1, Christian A Kell, Andreas Kleinschmidt.   

Abstract

We have recently shown that intrinsic fluctuations of ongoing activity during baseline have an impact on perceptual decisions reported for an ambiguous visual stimulus (Hesselmann et al., 2008). To test whether this result generalizes from the visual object domain to other perceptual and neural systems, the current study investigated the effect of ongoing signal fluctuations in motion-sensitive brain regions on the perception of coherent visual motion. We determined motion coherence thresholds individually for each subject using a dynamic random dot display. During functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), brief events of subliminal, supraliminal, and periliminal coherent motion were presented with long and variable interstimulus intervals between them. On each trial, subjects reported whether they had perceived "coherent" or "random" motion, and fMRI signal time courses were analyzed separately as a function of stimulus and percept type. In the right motion-sensitive occipito-temporal cortex (hMT+), coherent percepts of periliminal stimuli yielded a larger stimulus-evoked response than random percepts. Prestimulus baseline activity in this region was also significantly higher in these coherent trials than in random trials. As in our previous study, however, the relation between ongoing and evoked activity was not additive but interacted with perceptual outcome. Our data thus suggest that endogenous fluctuations in baseline activity have a generic effect on subsequent perceptual decisions. Although mainstream analytical techniques used in functional neuroimaging do not capture this nonadditive effect of baseline on evoked response, it is in accord with postulates from theoretical frameworks as, for instance, predictive coding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19118182      PMCID: PMC6671252          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4398-08.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  59 in total

Review 1.  Variability of perceptual multistability: from brain state to individual trait.

Authors:  Andreas Kleinschmidt; Philipp Sterzer; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Stimulus-induced visual cortical networks are recapitulated by spontaneous local and interareal synchronization.

Authors:  Christopher M Lewis; Conrado A Bosman; Thilo Womelsdorf; Pascal Fries
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Intrinsic connectivity between the hippocampus and posteromedial cortex predicts memory performance in cognitively intact older individuals.

Authors:  Liang Wang; Peter Laviolette; Kelly O'Keefe; Deepti Putcha; Akram Bakkour; Koene R A Van Dijk; Maija Pihlajamäki; Bradford C Dickerson; Reisa A Sperling
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Selective regions of the visuomotor system are related to gain-induced changes in force error.

Authors:  Stephen A Coombes; Daniel M Corcos; Lisa Sprute; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Global motion perception in 2-year-old children: a method for psychophysical assessment and relationships with clinical measures of visual function.

Authors:  Tzu-Ying Yu; Robert J Jacobs; Nicola S Anstice; Nabin Paudel; Jane E Harding; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Early visual cortex reflects initiation and maintenance of task set.

Authors:  Abdurahman S Elkhetali; Ryan J Vaden; Sean M Pool; Kristina M Visscher
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  The contribution of electrophysiology to functional connectivity mapping.

Authors:  Marieke L Schölvinck; David A Leopold; Matthew J Brookes; Patrick H Khader
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Improving visual perception through neurofeedback.

Authors:  Frank Scharnowski; Chloe Hutton; Oliver Josephs; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Geraint Rees
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Predictive coding or evidence accumulation? False inference and neuronal fluctuations.

Authors:  Guido Hesselmann; Sepideh Sadaghiani; Karl J Friston; Andreas Kleinschmidt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Computational and dynamic models in neuroimaging.

Authors:  Karl J Friston; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.