Literature DB >> 19117769

Survival analysis in men undergoing radical prostatectomy at an age of 70 years or older.

Michael Froehner1, Rainer Koch, Rainer J Litz, Oliver W Hakenberg, Sven Oehlschlaeger, Manfred P Wirth.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare comorbidity measures and to analyze survival rates in men undergoing radical prostatectomy at age 70 years or older.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 329 consecutive patients aged 70 or more years who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1992 and 2004 were studied. The patients were stratified by 5 comorbidity classifications, tumor stage, Gleason score, and PSA value. Mortality was subdivided into overall, comorbid, competing, prostate cancer-specific, and second cancer-specific mortality. Competing risk and Kaplan-Meier survival curves as well as Mantel-Haenszel hazard ratios were calculated. Comparisons were made with the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the independent significance of prognostic variables.
RESULTS: Considering the dose-response relationship, P values and the discrimination of 2 risk groups, the Charlson score was the best of the tested comorbidity classifications in men selected for radical prostatectomy at age 70 years or older. Beside the tumor-related factors Gleason score 8-10 (hazard ratio 2.61, P = 0.0234) and lymph node involvement (hazard ratio 2.89, P = 0.0145), a Charlson score of 1 or greater was identified as an independent predictor of overall mortality (hazard ratio 2.16, P = 0.0441). Without comorbidity or adverse tumor-related risk factors, elderly men had an excellent 10-year overall survival probability (77% to 100%, depending on the classification used), whereas 10-year overall survival was distinctly poor in the presence of lymph node metastases (30%) or Gleason score 8-10 disease (33%).
CONCLUSIONS: The Charlson comorbidity score may be used to stratify men selected for radical prostatectomy at age 70 years or older and to estimate long-term survival probability. In the absence of adverse tumor-related parameters or serious comorbidity, long-term survival probability is excellent in this subgroup.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19117769     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.10.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  2 in total

1.  Is age an independent risk factor for medical complications following minimally invasive radical prostatectomy? An evaluation of contemporary American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement (ACS-NSQIP) data.

Authors:  Lawrence M Dagrosa; Johann P Ingimarsson; Ivan P Gorlov; John H Higgins; Elias S Hyams
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-06-04

2.  Prostate cancer in Pennsylvania: The role of older age at diagnosis, aggressiveness, and environmental risk factors on treatment and mortality using data from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry.

Authors:  Shirley M Bluethmann; Ming Wang; Emily Wasserman; Chixiang Chen; Nicholas G Zaorsky; Raymond J Hohl; Alicia C McDonald
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 4.452

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.