Literature DB >> 19117234

Comparison of cervical vertebral separation in the supine and seated positions using home traction units.

Dennis C W Fater1, Thomas W Kernozek.   

Abstract

This study was performed for the purpose of comparing the magnitude of cervical vertebral separation during cervical traction in supine and seated positions using home traction units. A repeated measures design with two within-subject factors (type of traction and time) was used. Seventeen asymptomatic volunteers received cervical traction in seated and supine position. Subjects received 5 minutes of static traction in sitting or supine using a force of 13.6 kg while in 15 degrees of neck flexion. A lateral radiograph of the cervical spine was taken before traction force was applied and after five minutes of static traction. Anterior and posterior distances between the inferior border of C2 and the superior border of C7 were measured by a radiologist. After supine traction there were significant increases (p=0.001) in posterior cervical vertebral separation compared to any changes after seated traction. There were no significant changes in anterior vertebral separation during either supine or seated traction positions (p=0.769). Supine cervical traction may be more effective for increasing posterior vertebral separation than seated cervical traction.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19117234     DOI: 10.1080/09593980802511896

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiother Theory Pract        ISSN: 0959-3985            Impact factor:   2.279


  6 in total

1.  Home Care Neck Traction for a Patient With Neck Pain and Cervical Radiculopathy Symptoms: A Case Report.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2019-06-29

2.  Intradiscal Pressure Changes during Manual Cervical Distraction: A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  M R Gudavalli; T Potluri; G Carandang; R M Havey; L I Voronov; J M Cox; R M Rowell; R A Kruse; G C Joachim; A G Patwardhan; C N R Henderson; C Goertz
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  A randomized controlled trial of intermittent Cervical Traction in sitting Vs. Supine position for the management of Cervical Radiculopathy.

Authors:  Rehan Ramzan Khan; Waqar Ahmad Awan; Sajid Rashid; Tahir Masood
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

4.  Effect of an intensive cervical traction protocol on mid-term disability and pain in patients with cervical radiculopathy: An exploratory, prospective, observational pilot study.

Authors:  Thomas Rulleau; Sophie Abeille; Lydie Pastor; Lucie Planche; Pascale Allary; Catherine Chapeleau; Chloé Moreau; Grégoire Cormier; Michel Caulier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Changes in cervical muscle activity according to the traction force of an air-inflatable neck traction device.

Authors:  Jong Ho Kang; Tae-Sung Park
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-09-30

6.  The efficacy of a home-mechanical traction unit for patients with mild to moderate cervical osteoarthrosis: A pilot study.

Authors:  Batoul Bagheripour; Mojtaba Kamyab; Fatemeh Azadinia; Ali Amiri; Mohammad Akbari
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2016-06-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.