Literature DB >> 19116265

Unbound drug concentration in brain homogenate and cerebral spinal fluid at steady state as a surrogate for unbound concentration in brain interstitial fluid.

Xingrong Liu1, Kristine Van Natta, Helen Yeo, Olga Vilenski, Paul E Weller, Philip D Worboys, Mario Monshouwer.   

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to examine the accuracy of using unbound brain concentration determined by a brain homogenate method (C(ub)), cerebral spinal fluid concentration (C(CSF)), and unbound plasma concentration (C(up)) as a surrogate for brain interstitial fluid concentration determined by brain microdialysis (C(m)). Nine compounds-carbamazepine, citalopram, ganciclovir, metoclopramide, N-desmethylclozapine, quinidine, risperidone, 9-hydroxyrisperidone, and thiopental-were selected, and each was administered as an intravenous bolus (up to 5 mg/kg) followed by a constant intravenous infusion (1-9 mg/kg/h) for 6 h in rats. For eight of the nine compounds, the C(ub)s were within 3-fold of their C(m); thiopental had a C(m) 4-fold of its C(ub). The C(CSF)s of eight of the nine compounds were within 3-fold of their corresponding C(m); 9-hydroxyrisperidone showed a C(CSF) 5-fold of its C(m). The C(up)s of five of the nine compounds were within 3-fold of their C(m); four compounds (ganciclovir, metoclopramide, quinidine, and 9-hydroxyrisperidone) had C(up)s 6- to 14-fold of their C(m). In conclusion, the C(ub) and C(CSF) were within 3-fold of the C(m) for the majority of the compounds tested. The C(up)s were within 3-fold of C(m) for lipophilic non-P-glycoprotein (-P-gp) substrates and greater than 3-fold of C(m) for hydrophilic or P-gp substrates. The present study indicates that the brain homogenate and cerebral spinal fluid methods may be used as surrogate methods to predict brain interstitial fluid concentrations within 3-fold of error in drug discovery and development settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19116265     DOI: 10.1124/dmd.108.024125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos        ISSN: 0090-9556            Impact factor:   3.922


  48 in total

Review 1.  Improving the prediction of the brain disposition for orally administered drugs using BDDCS.

Authors:  Fabio Broccatelli; Caroline A Larregieu; Gabriele Cruciani; Tudor I Oprea; Leslie Z Benet
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  Cerebrospinal fluid cortisol and progesterone profiles and outcomes prognostication after severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Martina Santarsieri; Christian Niyonkuru; Emily H McCullough; Julie A Dobos; C Edward Dixon; Sarah L Berga; Amy K Wagner
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 3.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling of drug penetration across the blood-brain barrier--towards a mechanistic IVIVE-based approach.

Authors:  Kathryn Ball; François Bouzom; Jean-Michel Scherrmann; Bernard Walther; Xavier Declèves
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Brain Distributional Kinetics of a Novel MDM2 Inhibitor SAR405838: Implications for Use in Brain Tumor Therapy.

Authors:  Minjee Kim; Janice K Laramy; Gautham Gampa; Karen E Parrish; Richard Brundage; Jann N Sarkaria; William F Elmquist
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.922

5.  Determination of the unbound fraction of R- and S-methadone in human brain.

Authors:  Karen M D Holm; Kristian Linnet
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  Mass spectrometry imaging reveals heterogeneous efavirenz distribution within putative HIV reservoirs.

Authors:  Corbin G Thompson; Mark T Bokhart; Craig Sykes; Lourdes Adamson; Yuri Fedoriw; Paul A Luciw; David C Muddiman; Angela D M Kashuba; Elias P Rosen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Mechanistic understanding of brain drug disposition to optimize the selection of potential neurotherapeutics in drug discovery.

Authors:  Irena Loryan; Vikash Sinha; Claire Mackie; Achiel Van Peer; Wilhelmus Drinkenburg; An Vermeulen; Denise Morrison; Mario Monshouwer; Donald Heald; Margareta Hammarlund-Udenaes
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  An In Vitro Caseum Binding Assay that Predicts Drug Penetration in Tuberculosis Lesions.

Authors:  Jansy P Sarathy; Hsin-Pin Ho Liang; Danielle Weiner; Jacqueline Gonzales; Laura E Via; Véronique Dartois
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 9.  The hepatic cannabinoid 1 receptor as a modulator of hepatic energy state and food intake.

Authors:  Martin E Cooper; Simon E Regnell
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Prediction of Drug Penetration in Tuberculosis Lesions.

Authors:  Jansy P Sarathy; Fabio Zuccotto; Ho Hsinpin; Lars Sandberg; Laura E Via; Gwendolyn A Marriner; Thierry Masquelin; Paul Wyatt; Peter Ray; Véronique Dartois
Journal:  ACS Infect Dis       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 5.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.