Literature DB >> 19115313

Using Biomonitoring Equivalents to interpret human biomonitoring data in a public health risk context.

Sean M Hays1, Lesa L Aylward.   

Abstract

Increasingly sensitive analytical tools allow measurement of trace concentrations of chemicals in human biological media in persons from the general population. Such data are being generated by biomonitoring programs conducted by the US Centers for Disease Control and other researchers. However, few screening tools are available for interpretation of such data in a health risk assessment context. This review describes the concept and implementation of Biomonitoring Equivalents (BEs), estimates of the concentration of a chemical or metabolite in a biological medium that is consistent with an existing exposure guidance value such as a tolerable daily intake or reference dose. The BE approach integrates available pharmacokinetic data to convert an existing exposure guidance value into an equivalent concentration in a biological medium. Key concepts regarding the derivation and communication of BE values resulting from an expert workshop held in 2007 are summarized. BE derivations for four case study chemicals (toluene, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, cadmium and acrylamide) are presented, and the interpretation of biomonitoring data for these chemicals is presented using the BE values. These case studies demonstrate that a range of pharmacokinetic data and approaches can be used to derive BE values; fully developed physiologically based pharmacokinetic models, while useful, are not required. The resulting screening level evaluation can be used to classify these compounds into relative categories of low, medium and high priority for risk assessment follow-up. Future challenges related to the derivation and use of BE values as tools in risk management are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19115313     DOI: 10.1002/jat.1410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Toxicol        ISSN: 0260-437X            Impact factor:   3.446


  10 in total

Review 1.  Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Theo Colborn; Tyrone B Hayes; Jerrold J Heindel; David R Jacobs; Duk-Hee Lee; Toshi Shioda; Ana M Soto; Frederick S vom Saal; Wade V Welshons; R Thomas Zoeller; John Peterson Myers
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  Adult and child urinary 2,4-D in cities with and without cosmetic pesticide bylaws: a population-based cross-sectional pilot study.

Authors:  Scott A Venners; Neda Khoshnood; Matthew Jeronimo; Aaron Sobkowicz; Philip Provencher; Guanting Tang; Winnie Chu; Ray Copes
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 3.  Biomonitoring data for 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in the United States and Canada: interpretation in a public health risk assessment context using Biomonitoring Equivalents.

Authors:  Lesa L Aylward; Marsha K Morgan; Tye E Arbuckle; Dana B Barr; Carol J Burns; Bruce H Alexander; Sean M Hays
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  In Silico Models for Ecotoxicity of Pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Kunal Roy; Supratik Kar
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2016

5.  Evolving Science and Practice of Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Katherine von Stackelberg; Pamela R D Williams
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 6.  Exposure assessment of process-related contaminants in food by biomarker monitoring.

Authors:  Ivonne M C M Rietjens; P Dussort; Helmut Günther; Paul Hanlon; Hiroshi Honda; Angela Mally; Sue O'Hagan; Gabriele Scholz; Albrecht Seidel; James Swenberg; Justin Teeguarden; Gerhard Eisenbrand
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 7.  Biomonitoring as an Underused Exposure Assessment Tool in Occupational Safety and Health Context-Challenges and Way Forward.

Authors:  Susana Viegas; Maryam Zare Jeddi; Nancy B Hopf; Jos Bessems; Nicole Palmen; Karen S Galea; Kate Jones; Peter Kujath; Radu-Corneliu Duca; Hans Verhagen; Tiina Santonen; Robert Pasanen-Kase
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Learning from previous work and finding synergies in the domains of public and environmental health: EU-funded projects BRIDGE Health and HBM4EU.

Authors:  Madlen David; Gerda Schwedler; Lena Reiber; Hanna Tolonen; Anna-Maria Andersson; Marta Esteban López; Anke Joas; Miriam Schöpel; Alexandra Polcher; Marike Kolossa-Gehring
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2020-09-10

Review 9.  Advancing human health risk assessment: integrating recent advisory committee recommendations.

Authors:  Michael Dourson; Richard A Becker; Lynne T Haber; Lynn H Pottenger; Tiffany Bredfeldt; Penelope A Fenner-Crisp
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.635

10.  A framework for the next generation of risk science.

Authors:  Daniel Krewski; Margit Westphal; Melvin E Andersen; Gregory M Paoli; Weihsueh A Chiu; Mustafa Al-Zoughool; Maxine C Croteau; Lyle D Burgoon; Ila Cote
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.